Protocol of a scoping review of outcome domains in dermatology

被引:0
|
作者
Nadir, Umer [1 ]
Ahmed, Areeba [1 ]
Michael, D. Yi [1 ]
Hisham, Farhana Ikmal [1 ]
Dave, Loma [1 ]
Kottner, Jan [2 ]
Ezzedine, K. [3 ]
Garg, Amit [4 ]
Ingram, John R. [5 ]
Jemec, Gregor Borut Ernst [6 ]
Spuls, Phyllis, I [7 ]
Kirkham, Jamie J. [8 ]
Cahn, Brian [9 ]
Alam, Murad [10 ]
机构
[1] Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL USA
[2] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Henri Mondor Hosp, AP HP, Serv Dermatol, Paris, France
[4] Hofstra Northwell Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Long Isl City, NY USA
[5] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, Wales
[6] Roskilde Univ Hosp, Dermatol, Roskilde, Denmark
[7] Univ Amsterdam, Locat Acad Med Ctr, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Infect & Immun, Dept Dermatol,Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Manchester, Biostat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] Univ Illinois, Dept Dermatol, Chicago, IL USA
[10] Northwestern Univ, Dermatol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Dermatology; Protocols & guidelines; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; SETS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Core outcome sets (COSs) are agreed outcomes (domains (subdomains) and instruments) that should be measured as a minimum in clinical trials or practice in certain diseases or clinical fields. Worldwide, the number of COSs is increasing and there might be conceptual overlaps of domains (subdomains) and instruments within disciplines. The aim of this scoping review is to map and to classify all outcomes identified with COS projects relating to skin diseases. Methods and analysis We will conduct a scoping review of outcomes of skin disease-related COS initiatives to identify all concepts and their definitions. We will search PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. The search dates will be 1 January 2010 (the point at which Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) was established) to 1 January 2024. We will also review the COMET database and C3 website to identify parts of COSs (domains and/or instruments) that are being developed and published. This review will be supplemented by querying relevant stakeholders from COS organisations, dermatology organisations and patient organisations for additional COSs that were developed. The resulting long lists of outcomes will then be mapped into conceptually similar concepts. Ethics and dissemination This study was supported by departmental research funds from the Department of Dermatology at Northwestern University. An ethics committee review was waived since this protocol was done by staff researchers with no involvement of patient care. Conflicts of interests, if any, will be addressed by replacing participants with relevant conflicts or reassigning them. The results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals, social media posts and promotion by COS organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Topical proactive therapy in dermatology. A scoping review
    Makowska, Karolina
    Nowaczyk, Joanna
    Samochocki, Zbigniew
    Blicharz, Leszek
    Rudnicka, Lidia
    POSTEPY DERMATOLOGII I ALERGOLOGII, 2023, 40 (04): : 510 - 517
  • [22] Shared Decision-Making in Dermatology A Scoping Review
    Morrison, Tessalyn
    Johnson, Jacob
    Baghoomian, Wenelia
    Hamilton, Andrew
    Simpson, Eric
    Greiling, Teri
    Foster, Erin
    JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2021, 157 (03) : 330 - 337
  • [23] Patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric palliative care—a protocol for a scoping review
    Heidi Holmen
    Anette Winger
    Simen A. Steindal
    Charlotte Castor
    Lisbeth Gravdal Kvarme
    Kirsti Riiser
    Kari L. Mariussen
    Anja Lee
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [24] Fracture outcome definitions in observational osteoporosis drug effects studies: a scoping review protocol
    Konstantelos, Natalia
    Rzepka, Anna M.
    Cadarette, Suzanne M.
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (03) : 907 - 916
  • [25] Domains and outcome measures for the assessment of limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an international collaborative scoping review
    Lescoat, Alain
    Sandler, Robert D.
    Zimmermann, Francois
    Roofeh, David
    Hughes, Michael
    Pauling, John D.
    Murphy, Susan L.
    Chen, Yen T.
    Townsend, Whitney
    Buch, Maya H.
    Khanna, Dinesh
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 61 (08) : 3132 - 3148
  • [26] Postdischarge Outcome Domains in Pediatric Critical Care and the Instruments Used to Evaluate Them: A Scoping Review
    Maddux, Aline B.
    Pinto, Neethi
    Fink, Ericka L.
    Hartman, Mary E.
    Nett, Sholeen
    Biagas, Katherine
    Killien, Elizabeth Y.
    Dervan, Leslie A.
    Christie, LeeAnn M.
    Luckett, Peter M.
    Loftis, Laura
    Lackey, Mellanye
    Ringwood, Melissa
    Smith, McKenna
    Olson, Lenora
    Sorenson, Sam
    Meert, Kathleen L.
    Notterman, Daniel A.
    Pollack, Murray M.
    Mourani, Peter M.
    Watson, R. Scott
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (12) : E1313 - E1321
  • [27] Protocol for a scoping review of sepsis epidemiology
    Wilcox, M. Elizabeth
    Daou, Marietou
    Dionne, Joanna C.
    Dodek, Peter
    Englesakis, Marina
    Garland, Allan
    Lauzon, Claire
    Loubani, Osama
    Rochwerg, Bram
    Shankar-Hari, Manu
    Thavorn, Kednapa
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [28] Economics of abortion: a scoping review protocol
    Coast, Ernestina
    Lattof, Samantha R.
    Rodgers, Yana van der Meulen
    Moore, Brittany
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [29] Osteopathic education: A scoping review protocol
    MacMillan, A.
    Draper-Rodi, Jerry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE, 2023, 47
  • [30] Robotics in Nursing: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Darko, Elizabeth Mirekuwaa
    Kleib, Manal
    Lemermeyer, Gillian
    Tavakoli, Mahdi
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12