Transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and effective in autoimmune myopathies: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
de Sousa, L. F. A. [1 ]
Misse, R. G. [1 ]
dos Santos, L. M. [2 ]
Tanaka, C. [2 ,3 ]
Greve, J. M. A. [4 ]
Baptista, A. F. [3 ,5 ]
Shinjo, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med FMUSP, Div Rheumatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Dept Phys Therapy Speech Therapy & Occupat Therap, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Lab Invest Phys Therapy, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Lab Movement Studies,Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed ABC, Ctr Math Comp & Cognit, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
inflammatory myopathies; myositis; neuromodulation; safety; quality of life; IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; ANODAL-TDCS; ADULT; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; FATIGUE; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAMs).Methods This prospective, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, study included 20 patients with SAMs allocated to receive sham or active tDCS (2mA, 20 minutes, 3 days). Electrodes were positioned with the anode over the C1 or C2, whereas the cathode was placed over the Fp2 or Fp1, respectively. The groups were evaluated in four periods with specific questionnaires and functional tests: pre-stimulation and after 30 minutes, three weeks, and eight weeks post-tDCS.Results Two patients from the sham group withdrew after the three sessions. The demographic data, type of myositis, disease duration, and disease status were comparable between the active and sham tDCS groups. After interventions, in the active tDCS group, the physical aspects of SF-36 in week eight, mean and better timed up-and-go test at each evaluation, peak torque of stimulated inferior limb extension improved significantly (p<0.05). The emotional aspect of SF-36 decreased only in the active tDCS group (p<0.001). The patients' adherence to the protocol was 100% and no serious adverse event was reported, including disease relapses.Conclusion This study evidences the safety of tDCS, as well as its potential efficacy in improving muscle strength and function in SAMs patients. More studies with a larger sample and longer tDCS sessions are necessary to corroborate the results of the present study.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Repeated Sessions of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, and Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
    Prillinger, Karin
    Radev, Stefan T.
    de Lara, Gabriel Amador
    Kloebl, Manfred
    Lanzenberger, Rupert
    Plener, Paul L.
    Poustka, Luise
    Konicar, Lilian
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 12
  • [42] Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Crossover Trial of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Mal de Debarquement Syndrome
    Cha, Yoon-Hee
    Deblieck, Choi
    Wu, Allan D.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (06) : 805 - 812
  • [43] Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Cognition and Mood in Stroke Patients A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
    Kim, Bo Ryun
    Kim, Dae-Yul
    Chun, Min Ho
    Yi, Jin Hwa
    Kwon, Jae Sung
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2010, 89 (05) : 362 - 368
  • [44] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at Different Frequencies for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Randomized Trial
    Pei, Qian
    Wu, Baishan
    Tang, Yuanzhang
    Yang, Xiaohui
    Song, Liping
    Wang, Nan
    Li, Yan
    Sun, Chenli
    Ma, Shumin
    Ni, Jiaxiang
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2019, 22 (04) : E303 - E313
  • [45] Transcranial Pulsed-Current Stimulation versus Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: A Pilot, Sham-Controlled Cross-Over Double-Blind Study
    Barra, Alice
    Rosenfelder, Martin
    Mortaheb, Sepehr
    Carriere, Manon
    Martens, Geraldine
    Bodien, Yelena G.
    Morales-Quezada, Leon
    Bender, Andreas
    Laureys, Steven
    Thibaut, Aurore
    Fregni, Felipe
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [46] Modulation of central pain mechanisms using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation: A double-blind, sham-controlled study
    Kold, Sebastian
    Graven-Nielsen, Thomas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2023, 27 (02) : 303 - 315
  • [47] A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Augmentation Intervention for the Attenuation of Motor Deficits in Patients With Stroke
    Pinto, Ekta Franscina
    Gupta, Anupam
    Kulkarni, Girish Baburao
    Andrade, Chittaranjan
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2021, 37 (04) : 281 - 290
  • [48] Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: A randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study
    Alisar, Dilek Cetinkaya
    Ozen, Selin
    Sozay, Seyhan
    JOURNAL OF STROKE & CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2020, 29 (01):
  • [49] Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Somatic Symptom Disorder, Predominantly Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study
    Peethala, Prashanth
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 58 (05) : S79 - S79
  • [50] Transcranial DC stimulation (OCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation
    Gandiga, PC
    Hummel, FC
    Cohen, LG
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (04) : 845 - 850