Transcranial direct current stimulation is safe and effective in autoimmune myopathies: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
de Sousa, L. F. A. [1 ]
Misse, R. G. [1 ]
dos Santos, L. M. [2 ]
Tanaka, C. [2 ,3 ]
Greve, J. M. A. [4 ]
Baptista, A. F. [3 ,5 ]
Shinjo, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med FMUSP, Div Rheumatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Dept Phys Therapy Speech Therapy & Occupat Therap, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Lab Invest Phys Therapy, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Clin HCFMUSP, Fac Med, Lab Movement Studies,Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed ABC, Ctr Math Comp & Cognit, Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
inflammatory myopathies; myositis; neuromodulation; safety; quality of life; IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; ANODAL-TDCS; ADULT; CLASSIFICATION; GUIDELINES; FATIGUE; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with systemic autoimmune myopathies (SAMs).Methods This prospective, randomised, sham-controlled, double-blind, study included 20 patients with SAMs allocated to receive sham or active tDCS (2mA, 20 minutes, 3 days). Electrodes were positioned with the anode over the C1 or C2, whereas the cathode was placed over the Fp2 or Fp1, respectively. The groups were evaluated in four periods with specific questionnaires and functional tests: pre-stimulation and after 30 minutes, three weeks, and eight weeks post-tDCS.Results Two patients from the sham group withdrew after the three sessions. The demographic data, type of myositis, disease duration, and disease status were comparable between the active and sham tDCS groups. After interventions, in the active tDCS group, the physical aspects of SF-36 in week eight, mean and better timed up-and-go test at each evaluation, peak torque of stimulated inferior limb extension improved significantly (p<0.05). The emotional aspect of SF-36 decreased only in the active tDCS group (p<0.001). The patients' adherence to the protocol was 100% and no serious adverse event was reported, including disease relapses.Conclusion This study evidences the safety of tDCS, as well as its potential efficacy in improving muscle strength and function in SAMs patients. More studies with a larger sample and longer tDCS sessions are necessary to corroborate the results of the present study.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized, crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind study of transcranial direct current stimulation of left DLPFC on executive functions
    Dumont, Laurence
    El Mouderrib, Sofia
    Theoret, Hugo
    RESTORATIVE NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 36 (06) : 755 - 766
  • [32] Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Reduce Heavy Drinking: A Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Randomized Trial
    Witkiewitz, Katie
    Stein, Elena R.
    Votaw, Victoria R.
    Wilson, Adam D.
    Roos, Corey R.
    Gallegos, Stevi J.
    Clark, Vincent P.
    Claus, Eric D.
    ALCOHOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (06) : 1296 - 1307
  • [33] Transcranial direct current stimulation for knee osteoarthritis: a single-blind randomized sham-controlled trial
    Azizi, Sirous
    Rezasoltani, Zahra
    Najafi, Sharif
    Mohebi, Bahare
    Tabatabaee, Seyed Morteza
    Dadarkhah, Afsaneh
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 51 (04): : 329 - 338
  • [34] Effects of transcranial pulse stimulation on autism spectrum disorder: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial
    Cheung, Teris
    Li, Tim Man Ho
    Lam, Joyce Yuen Ting
    Fong, Kwan Hin
    Chiu, Lok Yi
    Ho, Yuen Shan
    Tse, Andy Choi-Yeung
    Li, Cheng-Ta
    Cheng, Calvin Pak-Wing
    Beisteiner, Roland
    BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 5 (05)
  • [35] A double-blind sham-controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of refractory auditory hallucinations
    Fitzgerald, PB
    Benitez, J
    Daskalakis, JZ
    Brown, TL
    Marston, NAU
    de Castella, A
    Kulkarni, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 25 (04) : 358 - 362
  • [36] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
    Akremi, Haifa
    Hamel, Raphael
    Dumas, Anne
    Camden, Chantal
    Corriveau, Helene
    Lepage, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2022, 52 (07) : 3202 - 3213
  • [37] Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Developmental Coordination Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Pilot Study
    Haifa Akremi
    Raphaël Hamel
    Anne Dumas
    Chantal Camden
    Hélène Corriveau
    Jean-Francois Lepage
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2022, 52 : 3202 - 3213
  • [38] Transcranial direct current stimulation to facilitate neurofunctional rehabilitation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a protocol for a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind clinical trial
    Araujo, Marcela O.
    Tamplain, Priscila
    Duarte, Natalia A. C.
    Comodo, Andrea C. M.
    Ferreira, Giselle O. A.
    Queiroga, Amanda
    Oliveira, Claudia S.
    Collange-Grecco, Luanda A.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [39] Bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation for upper-limb hemiparesis in acute stroke: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial
    Bolognini, N.
    Russo, C.
    Cairnero Souza, M. I.
    Nicotra, A.
    Olgiati, E.
    Spandri, V.
    Agostoni, E.
    Salmaggi, A.
    Vallar, G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 27 (12) : 2473 - 2482
  • [40] Prefrontal Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Treatment in Alcohol Dependence Syndrome (PreCoTTA): Study Protocol for a Double-blind Randomized Sham-controlled Trial
    Deshmukh, Anagha S.
    Praharaj, Samir Kumar
    Rai, Shweta
    Kamath, Asha
    Upadhya, Dinesh
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 16 (04) : 409 - 420