New research paradigms and agenda of human factors science in the intelligence era

被引:1
|
作者
Xu Wei [1 ]
Gao Zaifeng [2 ]
Ge Liezhong [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Psychol Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Psychol, Hangzhou 310058, Peoples R China
关键词
Human factors science; engineering psychology; human factors engineering; research paradigm; human-AI teaming; SITUATION AWARENESS; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS; AUTOMATION; FRAMEWORK; INTERNET; DESIGN; THINGS; MEDIA; TEAMS;
D O I
10.3724/SP.J.1041.2024.00363
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper first proposes the innovative concept of " human factors science" to characterize engineering psychology, human factors engineering, ergonomics, human-computer interaction, and other similar fields. Although the perspectives in these fields differ, they share a common goal: optimizing the human-machine relationship by applying a " human-centered design" approach. AI technology has brought in new characteristics, and our recent research reveals that the human-machine relationship presents a trans-era evolution from "human-machine interaction" to "human-AI teaming." These changes have raised questions and challenges for human factors science, compelling us to re-examine current research paradigms and agendas. In this context, this paper reviews and discusses the implications of the following three conceptual models and frameworks that we recently proposed to enrich the research paradigms for human factors science. (1) human-AI joint cognitive systems: this model differs from the traditional human-computer interaction paradigm and regards an intelligent system as a cognitive agent with a certain level of cognitive capabilities. Thus, a human-AI system can be characterized as a joint cognitive system in which two cognitive agents (human and intelligent agents) work as teammates for collaboration. (2) human-AI joint cognitive ecosystems: an intelligent ecosystem with multiple human-AI systems can be represented as a human-AI joint cognitive ecosystem. The overall system performance of the intelligent ecosystem depends on optimal collaboration and design across the multiple human-AI systems. (3) intelligent sociotechnical systems (iSTS): human-AI systems are designed, developed, and deployed in an iSTS environment. From a macro perspective, iSTS focuses on the interdependency between the technical and social subsystems. The successful design, development, and deployment of a human-AI system within an iSTS environment depends on the synergistic optimization between the two subsystems. This paper further enhances these frameworks from the research paradigm perspective. We propose three new research paradigms for human factors science in the intelligence ear: human-AI joint cognitive systems, human-AI joint cognitive ecosystems, and intelligent sociotechnical systems, enabling comprehensive human factors solutions for AI-based intelligent systems. Further analyses show that the three new research paradigms will benefit future research in human factors science. Furthermore, this paper looks forward to the future research agenda of human factors science from three aspects: "human-AI interaction," "intelligent human-machine interface," and " human-AI teaming." We believe the proposed research paradigms and the future research agenda will mutually promote each other, further advancing human factors science in the intelligence era.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 382
页数:20
相关论文
共 140 条
  • [91] Why Human-Autonomy Teaming?
    Shively, R. Jay
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer L.
    Matessa, Michael
    Battiste, Vernol
    Johnson, Walter W.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEUROERGONOMICS AND COGNITIVE ENGINEERING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 586 : 3 - 11
  • [92] Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 2019, Recommended Practice J3016
  • [93] Stahl B. C., 2021, Artificial intelligence for a better future: an ecosystem perspective on the ethics of AI and emerging digital technologies, P124
  • [94] The Next Generation of Socio-Technical Systems
    Steghofer, Jan-Philipp
    Diaconescu, Ada
    Marsh, Steve
    Pitt, Jeremy
    [J]. IEEE TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY MAGAZINE, 2017, 36 (03) : 46 - 47
  • [95] Teaching Machines to Recognize Neurodynamic Correlates of Team and Team Member Uncertainty
    Stevens, Ronald H.
    Galloway, Trysha L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 13 (04) : 310 - 327
  • [96] Sun X. H., 2011, Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, V26, P650
  • [97] [谭征宇 Tan Zhengyu], 2020, [计算机集成制造系统, Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems], V26, P2615
  • [98] Embedding Values in Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems
    van de Poel, Ibo
    [J]. MINDS AND MACHINES, 2020, 30 (03) : 385 - 409
  • [99] Six Challenges for Human-AI Co-learning
    van den Bosch, Karel
    Schoonderwoerd, Tjeerd
    Blankendaal, Romy
    Neerincx, Mark
    [J]. ADAPTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEMS, AIS 2019, 2019, 11597 : 572 - 589
  • [100] Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety
    Waterson, Patrick
    Robertson, Michelle M.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    Militello, Laura
    Roth, Emilie
    Stanton, Neville A.
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 2015, 58 (04) : 565 - 599