Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review
    Grivas, Nikolaos
    Zachos, Ioannis
    Georgiadis, Georgios
    Karavitakis, Markos
    Tzortzis, Vasilis
    Mamoulakis, Charalampos
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (04) : 929 - 949
  • [42] ROBOT-ASSISTED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY FOR RECTAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Kim, J.
    Lee, S. H.
    Lim, S.
    Lee, N. R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (03) : A70 - A70
  • [43] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Pediatric Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
    Greenwald, David
    Mohanty, Amrita
    Andolfi, Ciro
    Gundeti, Mohan S.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 448 - 461
  • [44] A Comparative Study of Transvaginal Repair and Laparoscopic Repair in the Management of Patients With Previous Cesarean Scar Defect
    Zhang, Ying
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (04) : 535 - 541
  • [45] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robot-Assisted Mitral Valve Repair
    Hassanabad, Ali Fatehi
    Nagase, Fernanda N. I.
    Basha, Ameen M.
    Hammal, Fadi
    Menon, Devidas
    Kent, William D. T.
    Ali, Imtiaz S.
    Nagendran, Jeevan
    Stafinski, Tania
    INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 17 (06) : 471 - 481
  • [46] Low Quality of Evidence for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Results of a Systematic Review of the Published Literature Editorial Comment
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05): : 1988 - 1988
  • [47] Robot-assisted repair of hiatal hernia: Advantages and disadvantages in comparison to conventional laparoscopic repair: A literature review
    Pelzner, Kim
    Mueller, Dolores T.
    Fuchs, Claudia
    Maus, Martin
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    Leers, Jessica M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL AND HERNIA SURGERY, 2023, 6 (02) : 77 - 80
  • [48] Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with intracorporeal suturing
    S. Schluender
    J. Conrad
    C. M. Divino
    B. Gurland
    Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2003, 17 (9): : 1391 - 1395
  • [49] CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS TRADITIONAL LAPAROTOMY FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Park, D.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A433 - A433
  • [50] Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal artery aneurysm repair: The video
    不详
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2004, 18 : A212 - A212