Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Evidence Behind Robot-Assisted Abdominopelvic Surgery A Systematic Review
    Dhanani, Naila H.
    Olavarria, Oscar A.
    Bernardi, Karla
    Lyons, Nicole B.
    Holihan, Julie L.
    Loor, Michele
    Haynes, Alex B.
    Liang, Mike K.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 174 (08) : 1110 - +
  • [32] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC REPAIR OF COMPLEX VESICOVAGINAL FISTULA
    Ganesamoni, Raguram
    Mishra, Shashikant
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Vyas, Jigish
    Sabnis, Ravindra B.
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A469 - A469
  • [33] Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms
    Roddy, Sean P.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 51 (04) : 1062 - 1062
  • [34] Utility of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Inguinal Hernia Following Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Funamizu, Naotake
    Mineta, Sho
    Ozaki, Takahiro
    Mishima, Kohei
    Igarashi, Kazuharu
    Omura, Kenji
    Takada, Yasutsugu
    Wakabayashi, G. O.
    IN VIVO, 2022, 36 (03): : 1432 - 1437
  • [35] A Critical Systematic Review of Recent Clinical Trials Comparing Open Retropubic, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Heer, R.
    Raymond, I.
    Jackson, M. J.
    Soomro, N. A.
    REVIEWS ON RECENT CLINICAL TRIALS, 2011, 6 (03) : 241 - 249
  • [36] Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: A review
    Salloum, C.
    Lim, C.
    Malek, A.
    Compagnon, P.
    Azoulay, D.
    JOURNAL OF VISCERAL SURGERY, 2016, 153 (06) : 447 - 456
  • [37] In-vitro fertilization outcomes after laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect
    Shin, S. Y.
    Hwang, K.
    Shin, J. E.
    Choi, D. H.
    Kim, J. H.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [38] Laparoscopic repair of cesarean section scar defect and the surgical outcome in 146 patients
    Zhang, Xuyin
    Wu, Chaoying
    Yang, Mengyi
    Xu, Heyang
    He, Yuan
    Ding, Jingxin
    Hua, Keqin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (03): : 4408 - 4416
  • [39] Learning curves in laparoscopic and robot-assisted prostate surgery: a systematic search and review
    Nikolaos Grivas
    Ioannis Zachos
    Georgios Georgiadis
    Markos Karavitakis
    Vasilis Tzortzis
    Charalampos Mamoulakis
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 929 - 949
  • [40] Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Tang, Kun
    Li, Heng
    Xia, Ding
    Yu, Gan
    Guo, Xiaolin
    Guan, Wei
    Xu, Hua
    Ye, Zhangqun
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (03): : 187 - 195