Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence

被引:7
|
作者
Gkegkes, Ioannis D. [1 ,2 ]
Psomiadou, Victoria [3 ]
Minis, Evelyn [4 ]
Iavazzo, Christos [3 ]
机构
[1] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Colorectal Surg, 17C James House, Exeter EX2 5DS, Devon, England
[2] Athens Colorectal Lab, Athens, Greece
[3] Metaxa Canc Hosp, Gynaecol Oncol Dept, Piraeus, Greece
[4] Rutgers New Jersey Med Sch, Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Hlth, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
Cesarean scar defect; Cesarean section; Cesarean delivery; Robotic; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; PLACENTA-ACCRETA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01502-w
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
We aim to assess the available evidence concerning the robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect. A systematic PubMed and Scopus search was conducted. All databases were assessed up to May 23, 2022. Studies reporting data on robot-assisted repair of cesarean scar defect were included in this review. Data of 34 patients are presented. The mean age of the patients was 34.8 years old. The mean number of times a woman has been pregnant (gravidity) was 3.1, while the mean number of parity among the included women was 1.9. The mean number of previous cesarean sections among the included women is 1.8. The commonest symptoms at presentation of cesarean scar defect were vaginal bleeding, dysmenorrhea, abdominal pain, secondary infertility amenorrhea and ectopic cesarean scar pregnancy. The gestational age at time of surgery ranged between 6 and 14 weeks. The mean operative time was 165.2 min, while the reported blood loss during the operation ranged between 0 and 400 ml. Bladder perforation was the only intraoperative complication reported (1 out of 34, 2.9%). No conversion to open was reported. The mean interval between the last cesarean section and the development of cesarean scar defect was 22.8 months. Subsequent pregnancy after robotic assisted repair was reported in 16 out of 34 patients (47.1%). Robot-assisted treatment for cesarean scar defect has acceptable effectiveness and risks. Based on available data, uterus-sparing therapy should be considered in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies or symptomatic cesarean scar defect who wish to preserve their fertility. Finally, the role of a combined robotic and hysteroscopic correction of cesarean scar defect for reducing the blood loss and reducing the following obstetrical complications warrants future research.
引用
收藏
页码:745 / 751
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar defect: a systematic review of clinical evidence
    Ioannis D. Gkegkes
    Victoria Psomiadou
    Evelyn Minis
    Christos Iavazzo
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 745 - 751
  • [2] Laparoscopic Repair of Cesarean Scar Defect "Isthmocele''
    Urman, Bulent
    Arslan, Tonguc
    Aksu, Sertan
    Taskiran, Cagatay
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) : 857 - 858
  • [3] Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A systematic review
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Nouara, Giacomo
    Aragona, Maurizio
    Artibani, Walter
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2007, 51 (01) : 45 - 56
  • [4] Laparoscopic Cesarean Scar Defect Repair in Six Steps
    Mercado, Mary Evangeline Villa
    Gonzalez, Gillian Patrick Cruz
    Lee, Chyi-Long
    Huang, Kuan-Gen
    GYNECOLOGY AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY-GMIT, 2024, 13 (04): : 276 - 277
  • [5] A feasible procedure for laparoscopic cesarean scar defect repair
    Wang, Shengke
    Wang, Dongdong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 232 (03) : 332 - 335
  • [6] Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a systematic review
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    Sforza, Simone
    Grosso, Antonio A.
    Valastro, Francesca
    Tellini, Riccardo
    Cini, Chiara
    Landi, Luca
    Taverna, Maria
    Elia, Antonio
    Mantovani, Alberto
    Minervini, Andrea
    Carini, Marco
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (06) : 673 - 690
  • [7] Clinical outcomes of hysteroscopy-assisted transvaginal repair of cesarean scar defect
    Zhou, Dan
    Wu, Fengli
    Zhang, Qiao
    Cui, Ying
    Huang, Shuai
    Lv, Qiubo
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2020, 46 (02) : 279 - 285
  • [8] Clinical and Cost Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review
    Ye, Linda
    Tang, Amber B.
    Shenoy, Rivfka
    Mederos, Michael A.
    Mak, Selene S.
    Booth, Marika S.
    Wilson, Mark
    Gunnar, William
    Girgis, Mark D.
    Maggard-Gibbons, Melinda
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 232 (05) : 746 - 763.e2
  • [9] Laparoscopic Repair of Post-Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect
    Demers, Suzanne
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (04) : 537 - 537
  • [10] Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy
    Xiang, Jiangdong
    Cao, Yannan
    Zhou, Lina
    Yang, Haiying
    Wu, Sufang
    Li, Linxia
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 50 (01)