A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Mitchell, James W. [2 ]
Callaghan, Stephen [3 ]
Yameen, Farheen [3 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Dodd, Susanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, NIHR, ARC, NWC, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Hlth Data Sci, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Lancashire, England
关键词
Core outcome sets; Routine care; Healthcare evaluation; Health outcomes; COMET; Clinical audit; Value -based healthcare; Patient; -centered; outcome measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.Results: Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).Conclusion: An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcome Reporting in Studies on Perinatal Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review
    King, Alexandria
    D'Souza, Rohan D.
    Herman, Dylan
    Malinowski, Ann K.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 164S - 164S
  • [32] Variation in outcome reporting in studies on Vasa Previa: A Systematic Review
    Villani, Linda A.
    Pavalagantharajah, Sureka
    D'Souza, Rohan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S231 - S232
  • [33] COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
    Kirkham, Jamie J.
    Gorst, Sarah
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Blazeby, Jane
    Clarke, Mike
    Devane, Declan
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Williamson, Paula R.
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [34] COS-STAR: a reporting guideline for studies developing core outcome sets (protocol)
    Jamie J. Kirkham
    Sarah Gorst
    Douglas G. Altman
    Jane Blazeby
    Mike Clarke
    Declan Devane
    Elizabeth Gargon
    Paula R. Williamson
    Trials, 16
  • [35] Outcome selection, measurement and reporting for new surgical procedures and devices: a systematic review of IDEAL/IDEAL-D studies to inform development of a core outcome set
    Macefield, R. C.
    Wilson, N.
    Hoffmann, C.
    Blazeby, J. M.
    McNair, A. G. K.
    Avery, K. N. L.
    Potter, S.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (06): : 1072 - 1083
  • [36] Development of a core outcome set for use in routine orthodontic clinical trials
    Tsichlaki, Aliki
    O'Brien, Kevin
    Benson, Philip E.
    Marshman, Zoe
    Johal, Ama
    Colonio-Salazar, Fiorella B.
    Harman, Nicola L.
    Fleming, Padhraig S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 158 (05) : 650 - 660
  • [37] Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
    Sabet, Tamer S.
    Anderson, David B.
    Stubbs, Peter W.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Gagnier, Joel
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [38] Identifying common core outcome domains from core outcome sets of musculoskeletal conditions: protocol for a systematic review
    Tamer S. Sabet
    David B. Anderson
    Peter W. Stubbs
    Rachelle Buchbinder
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Alessandro Chiarotto
    Joel Gagnier
    Arianne P. Verhagen
    Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [39] Core Outcome Sets in clinical Studies
    Kottner, Jan
    Lechner, Anna
    PFLEGE, 2020, 33 (03): : 177 - 178
  • [40] Developing a core outcome set in interventions to prevent stillbirth: A systematic review on variations of outcome reporting
    Kim, Bobae, V
    Aromataris, Edoardo C.
    de Lint, Willem
    Middleton, Philippa
    Townsent, Rosemary
    Khalil, Asma
    Duffy, James M.
    Flenady, Vicki
    Thangaratinam, Shakila
    Mol, Ben W.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2021, 259 : 196 - 206