A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care

被引:10
|
作者
Kearney, Anna [1 ,4 ]
Gargon, Elizabeth [1 ]
Mitchell, James W. [2 ]
Callaghan, Stephen [3 ]
Yameen, Farheen [3 ]
Williamson, Paula R. [1 ]
Dodd, Susanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Hlth Data Sci, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Syst Mol & Integrat Biol, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, NIHR, ARC, NWC, Liverpool, Lancashire, England
[4] Univ Liverpool, Hlth Data Sci, Block F Waterhouse Bldg,1-5 Brownlow St, Liverpool L69 3GL, Lancashire, England
关键词
Core outcome sets; Routine care; Healthcare evaluation; Health outcomes; COMET; Clinical audit; Value -based healthcare; Patient; -centered; outcome measures; CLINICAL-TRIALS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.Methods: Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.Results: Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).Conclusion: An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 43
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Core outcome sets and systematic reviews
    Mike Clarke
    Paula R. Williamson
    Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [22] Variation in the outcome reported by studies of interventions for atypical endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review (the first step in the development of CRUK-funded Core Outcome Sets)
    Tan, A.
    Rivas, C.
    Yorke, S.
    Khan, K.
    Rogozinska, E.
    Brockbank, E.
    Manchanda, R.
    Cooper, N.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 126 : 85 - 85
  • [23] Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
    Marie Österberg
    Christel Hellberg
    Ann Kristine Jonsson
    Sara Fundell
    Frida Trönnberg
    Alkistis Skalkidou
    Maria Jonsson
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [24] New methods for an update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
    Gargon, Elizabeth
    Gorst, Sarah
    Norman, Christopher
    Leeflang, Mariska
    Neveol, Aurelie
    Williamson, Paula
    TRIALS, 2019, 20
  • [25] Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review
    Osterberg, Marie
    Hellberg, Christel
    Jonsson, Ann Kristine
    Fundell, Sara
    Tronnberg, Frida
    Skalkidou, Alkistis
    Jonsson, Maria
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [26] Core outcome sets in women's and newborn health: a systematic review
    Duffy, J. M. N.
    Rolph, R.
    Gale, C.
    Hirsch, M.
    Khan, K. S.
    Ziebland, S.
    McManus, R. J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (10) : 1481 - 1489
  • [27] Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on vital pulp treatment: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set
    Cushley, Siobhan
    Duncan, Henry F.
    Lundy, Fionnuala T.
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Clarke, Mike
    El Karim, Ikhlas
    INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2022, 55 (09) : 891 - 909
  • [28] Outcome reporting in cardio-obstetrics studies: A systematic review
    Hall, Chelsea
    Shishkina, Anna
    Thurman, Robin
    Ashraf, Rizwana
    Pal, Ankita
    Horn, Daphne
    Keepanasseril, Anish
    D'Souza, Rohan
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 278 : 223 - 234
  • [29] Variation in Outcome Reporting in Studies on Obesity in Pregnancy - A Systematic Review
    Dadouch, Rachel
    Faheim, Mina
    Susini, Orsolina
    Showell, Marian
    D'Souza, Rohan D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 207S - 207S
  • [30] Outcome Reporting in Interventional Necrotizing Enterocolitis Studies: A Systematic Review
    van Varsseveld, Otis C.
    Klerk, Daphne H.
    Jester, Ingo
    Lacher, Martin
    Kooi, Elisabeth M. W.
    Hulscher, Jan B. F.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2023, 58 (11) : 2105 - 2113