A Security Comparison between AES-128 and AES-256 FPGA implementations against DPA attacks

被引:0
|
作者
Zuniga Gonzalez, Virginia [1 ]
Tena-Sanchez, Erica [1 ,2 ]
Acosta, Antonio J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, CSIC, Inst Microelect Sevilla, Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Seville, Escuela Politecn Super, Dept Elect Technol, Seville, Spain
[3] Univ Seville, Fac Phys, Dept Elect & Electromagnetism, Seville, Spain
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Security comparison; AES cipher; Differential Power Analysis attack; MTD; FPGA;
D O I
10.1109/DCIS58620.2023.10336003
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
As the AES is the standard symmetric cipher selected by NIST, is the best-known and the most widely used block cipher. Consequently, security threats are constantly rising and increasingly powerful. With the addition of the upcoming scenario of quantum computing, these threats have become a front-line concern in the crypto-community. Although is claimed that using larger key sizes in symmetric key algorithms for implementing quantum-resistant implementations is enough to counteract brute force attacks, this paper shows that both AES128 and AES-256 are vulnerable to Power Analysis attacks. This paper presents a security comparison against Differential Power Analysis (DPA) attacks over both AES 128-256. Through experimental attacks in FPGA AES implementations, results show that although AES-256 reaches a greater level of security than AES128, is still vulnerable to this kind of attack. Specifically, we have obtained 75% of the bytes needed to find the original key for AES-128 while only 28.125% for AES-256 by performing the same attack.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research and implementation of 128/256 bit AES lightweight IP core for medical information security based on FPGA
    Liu, Boyang
    BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 125 : 175 - 176
  • [42] Security audit in cloud-based server by using encrypted data AES-256 and SHA-256
    Husni, M.
    Ciptaningtyas, H. T.
    Suadi, W.
    Ijtihadie, R. M.
    Anggoro, R.
    Salam, M. F.
    Arifiani, S.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATION 2019 (ICIEVE 2019), PTS 1-4, 2020, 830
  • [43] Hardening AES Hardware Implementations Against Fault and Error Inject Attacks
    Bu, Lake
    Kinsy, Michel A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 GREAT LAKES SYMPOSIUM ON VLSI (GLSVLSI'18), 2018, : 499 - 502
  • [44] Invariant of Enhanced AES Algorithm Implementations Against Power Analysis Attacks
    Ansari, Nadia Mustaqim
    Hussain, Rashid
    Arif, Sheeraz
    Hussain, Syed Sajjad
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 72 (01): : 1861 - 1875
  • [45] Experimental Implementation of DPA Attacks on AES Design with Flash-based FPGA Technology
    Kamoun, Najeh
    Bossuet, Lilian
    Ghazel, Adel
    2009 6TH INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, SIGNALS AND DEVICES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 964 - +
  • [46] Empirical and statistical comparison of intermediate steps of AES-128 and RSA in terms of time consumption
    Pranav, Prashant
    Dutta, Sandip
    Chakraborty, Soubhik
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (21) : 13127 - 13145
  • [47] Improved Quantum Rebound Attacks on Double Block Length Hashing with Round-Reduced AES-256 and ARIA-256
    Lee, Dongjae
    Hong, Seokhie
    IACR TRANSACTIONS ON SYMMETRIC CRYPTOLOGY, 2024, 2024 (03) : 238 - 265
  • [48] Key Structures: Improved Related-Key Boomerang Attack Against the Full AES-256
    Guo, Jian
    Song, Ling
    Wang, Haoyang
    INFORMATION SECURITY AND PRIVACY, ACISP 2022, 2022, 13494 : 3 - 23
  • [49] A Voltage Regulator-Assisted Lightweight AES Implementation Against DPA Attacks
    Yu, Weize
    Kose, Selcuk
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS I-REGULAR PAPERS, 2016, 63 (08) : 1152 - 1163
  • [50] Hardware Implementation and Comparison of CRA and TRA when Trying to Recover the AES-128 Key
    Vladimirov, Ivaylo
    Nikolova, Desislava
    Terneva, Zomica
    2020 55TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION, COMMUNICATION AND ENERGY SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (IEEE ICEST 2020), 2020, : 256 - 258