Are the Choosing Wisely Canada Cancer recommendations relevant and up to date with the current evidence?

被引:2
|
作者
Karim, Safiya [1 ,5 ]
Doll, Corinne M. [1 ]
Dingley, Brittany [2 ]
Merchant, Shaila [3 ,4 ]
de Moraes, Fabio Ynoe [3 ,4 ]
Booth, Christopher M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Canc Res Inst, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, 1331 29th St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF CANCER POLICY | 2023年 / 35卷
关键词
Choosing Wisely; Value; Oncology; NATIONAL-SURVEY; METASTASES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100406
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The Choosing Wisely (CW) Canada campaign was launched in 2012 to identify low-value, unnecessary and/or harmful services that are frequently used. The CW Canada Cancer list was developed in 2014 by a task force convened by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The list outlines ten harmful or low-value practices that oncologists should avoid. We conducted a study of oncologists to understand the familiarity with the current recommendations and whether these continue to be relevant and up to date. Methods: An electronic survey was developed by the members of the CW Oncology Working Group and distributed to practicing oncologists. The survey consisted of questions on 1) the familiarity of the existing CW Canada Cancer list 2) the relevance of the current list to current evidence and 3) any recommendation(s) that could be added or removed from the existing list. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses and narrative analysis was used to identify themes in open-ended questions. Results: Between January 14 and May 3, 2022, 151 survey responses were received (overall response rate of 20 %) from 68 medical oncologists (45 % of study cohort, response rate 32 %), 54 radiation oncologists (36 % of study cohort, response rate 14 %) and 29 surgical oncologists (19 % of study cohort, response rate 18 %). Seventy-nine percent (120/151) of respondents were familiar with the current list and 65 % (78/119) said they implemented the recommendations "always" or "most of the time". Eight recommendations had > 80 % agreement that they were relevant and up to date with current evidence. There was interest in adding a new recommendation to avoid whole brain radiation and consider stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with & LE; 4 brain metastases. Conclusions: There is excellent familiarity with the CW Canada Cancer list amongst the survey respondents and most recommendations continue to be relevant and up to date with current evidence. There is an opportunity to educate physicians about the intent of the campaign and to add a new recommendation on the use of SRS for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. There is also an opportunity to identify barriers at the patient, provider and institution level that are hindering adoption of the CW Canada Cancer list Policy summary: This survey will impact implementation and publication of an updated CW Canada Cancer list.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Screening for new primary cancers in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A provincial analysis of the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.
    Tesch, Megan E.
    Laing, Kara E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 36 (15)
  • [42] Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations Interview with D. S. Campbell MD, CCFP
    Campbell, D. S.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2017, 63 (07) : 541 - 541
  • [43] Imaging studies in patients with spinal pain Practice audit evaluation of Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations
    Ferrari, Robert
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2016, 62 (03) : E129 - E137
  • [44] Implementation of Choosing Wisely® Recommendations for Lymph Node Surgery in Male Breast Cancer
    Pratt, Catherine G.
    Whitrock, Jenna N.
    Carter, Michela M.
    Long, Szu-Aun
    Lewis, Jaime D.
    Heelan, Alicia A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (11) : 7641 - 7653
  • [45] Choosing wisely in cancer control across Canada-a set of baseline indicators
    Tran, K.
    Rahal, R.
    Fung, S.
    Lockwood, G.
    Louzado, C.
    Xu, J.
    Bryant, H.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2017, 24 (03) : 201 - 206
  • [46] Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
    Alexander Singer
    Leanne Kosowan
    Elissa M. Abrams
    Alan Katz
    Lisa Lix
    Katrina Leong
    Allison Paige
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [47] Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail
    Singer, Alexander
    Kosowan, Leanne
    Abrams, Elissa M.
    Katz, Alan
    Lix, Lisa
    Leong, Katrina
    Paige, Allison
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [48] Choosing wisely recommendations against prophylactic bilateral mastectomy: Analysis of the National cancer database
    Wallace, Audrey S.
    Threet, Abby
    Richman, Joshua
    Lancaster, Rachel
    Parker, Catherine C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (04)
  • [49] Choosing Wisely for COVID-19: ten evidence-based recommendations for patients and physicians
    C. S. Pramesh
    Giridhara R. Babu
    Joyeeta Basu
    Indu Bhushan
    Christopher M. Booth
    Girish Chinnaswamy
    Randeep Guleria
    S. P. Kalantri
    Gagandeep Kang
    Pavitra Mohan
    Nachiket Mor
    Madhukar Pai
    Manu Prakash
    Priscilla Rupali
    Priya Sampathkumar
    Manju Sengar
    Richard Sullivan
    Priya Ranganathan
    Nature Medicine, 2021, 27 : 1324 - 1327
  • [50] Critical and Honest Conversations: The Evidence Behind the "Choosing Wisely" Campaign Recommendations by the American Society of Nephrology
    Williams, Amy W.
    Dwyer, Amy C.
    Eddy, Allison A.
    Fink, Jeffrey C.
    Jaber, Bertrand L.
    Linas, Stuart L.
    Michael, Beckie
    O'Hare, Ann M.
    Schaefer, Heidi M.
    Shaffer, Rachel N.
    Trachtman, Howard
    Weiner, Daniel E.
    Falk, Ronald J.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2012, 7 (10): : 1664 - 1672