共 50 条
Are the Choosing Wisely Canada Cancer recommendations relevant and up to date with the current evidence?
被引:2
|作者:
Karim, Safiya
[1
,5
]
Doll, Corinne M.
[1
]
Dingley, Brittany
[2
]
Merchant, Shaila
[3
,4
]
de Moraes, Fabio Ynoe
[3
,4
]
Booth, Christopher M.
[3
,4
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calgary, Dept Oncol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Dept Surg, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Queens Univ, Dept Oncol, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Div Canc Care & Epidemiol, Canc Res Inst, Kingston, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Tom Baker Canc Ctr, 1331 29th St NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
来源:
关键词:
Choosing Wisely;
Value;
Oncology;
NATIONAL-SURVEY;
METASTASES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jcpo.2023.100406
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Introduction: The Choosing Wisely (CW) Canada campaign was launched in 2012 to identify low-value, unnecessary and/or harmful services that are frequently used. The CW Canada Cancer list was developed in 2014 by a task force convened by the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The list outlines ten harmful or low-value practices that oncologists should avoid. We conducted a study of oncologists to understand the familiarity with the current recommendations and whether these continue to be relevant and up to date. Methods: An electronic survey was developed by the members of the CW Oncology Working Group and distributed to practicing oncologists. The survey consisted of questions on 1) the familiarity of the existing CW Canada Cancer list 2) the relevance of the current list to current evidence and 3) any recommendation(s) that could be added or removed from the existing list. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses and narrative analysis was used to identify themes in open-ended questions. Results: Between January 14 and May 3, 2022, 151 survey responses were received (overall response rate of 20 %) from 68 medical oncologists (45 % of study cohort, response rate 32 %), 54 radiation oncologists (36 % of study cohort, response rate 14 %) and 29 surgical oncologists (19 % of study cohort, response rate 18 %). Seventy-nine percent (120/151) of respondents were familiar with the current list and 65 % (78/119) said they implemented the recommendations "always" or "most of the time". Eight recommendations had > 80 % agreement that they were relevant and up to date with current evidence. There was interest in adding a new recommendation to avoid whole brain radiation and consider stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with & LE; 4 brain metastases. Conclusions: There is excellent familiarity with the CW Canada Cancer list amongst the survey respondents and most recommendations continue to be relevant and up to date with current evidence. There is an opportunity to educate physicians about the intent of the campaign and to add a new recommendation on the use of SRS for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. There is also an opportunity to identify barriers at the patient, provider and institution level that are hindering adoption of the CW Canada Cancer list Policy summary: This survey will impact implementation and publication of an updated CW Canada Cancer list.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文