Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

被引:4
|
作者
Rundle, Kiata [1 ]
Curtis, Guy J. [2 ]
Clare, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Law, Discipline Psychol, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; Reasons; Personality; Individual differences; Autonomy; Grit; Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Norms; Motivation; DARK TRIAD; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-INTEGRITY; RATIONAL CHOICE; DIRTY DOZEN; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; MORALITY; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00132-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating - students outsourcing assignments to ghost-writers and submitting it as their own - is an issue facing tertiary education institutions globally. Approximately 3% to 11% of higher education students may engage on contract cheating. Understanding why nearly 90% of students do not engage in contract cheating is as important as understanding why other students do, as it can aid in the development of effective interventions and policies. This study addressed limitations in previous research and built upon a measure of Reasons for Not Contract Cheating (RNCC). In this study, 403 university students participated in an online survey consisting of a revised version of the Reasons for Not Contract Cheating measure (RNCC-R) and measures of psychological individual differences, such as the dark triad personality traits, self-control, and autonomy. Two higher-order factors and six sub-factors were identified in the RNCC-R, which included some similarities to the original RNCC. The findings from this study demonstrate the importance of psychological individual differences, such as satisfaction of the need for autonomy, grit (perseverance of effort), and Machiavellianism, in predicting the reasons why students do not engage in contract cheating. Consistent with previous research, this study provides support for the importance of students' motivation for learning, and their perceived morals and norms, as reasons for not engaging in contract cheating. It additionally provides evidence of the importance of the academic environment, such as respect for academic staff, as a reason why students do not engage in contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why do satisfied customers defect? A closer look at the simultaneous effects of switching barriers and inducements on customer loyalty
    Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen
    Rauschnabel, Philipp A.
    Marimuthu, Malliga
    Thurasamy, Ramayah
    Bang Nguyen
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2017, 27 (03) : 616 - 641
  • [42] Academic Cyberslacking: Why Do Students Engage in Non-Academic Internet Access During Lectures?
    Simanjuntak, Ermida
    Nawangsari, Nur Ainy Fardana
    Ardi, Rahkman
    PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 : 3257 - 3273
  • [43] Organ Trafficking: Why Do Healthcare Workers Engage in It?
    Stammers, Trevor
    CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2022, 31 (03) : 368 - 378
  • [44] Why Do People Engage in Corruption? The Case of Estonia
    Tavits, Margit
    SOCIAL FORCES, 2010, 88 (03) : 1257 - 1279
  • [45] Why do not all firms engage in tax avoidance?
    Jacob, Martin
    Rohlfing-Bastian, Anna
    Sandner, Kai
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 15 (02) : 459 - 495
  • [46] Why do college students engage in in-class media multitasking behaviours? A social learning perspective
    Yin, Chunxiao
    Li, Lirui
    Yu, Liang
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 55 (03) : 1105 - 1125
  • [47] Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?
    Carayol, N
    Thi, TUN
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2005, 14 (01) : 70 - 79
  • [48] Why do not all firms engage in tax avoidance?
    Martin Jacob
    Anna Rohlfing-Bastian
    Kai Sandner
    Review of Managerial Science, 2021, 15 : 459 - 495
  • [49] Why Do They Look So Happy?
    Bao, George Chengxi
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 22 (12) : 1619 - 1620
  • [50] Why do we look for pebbles?
    Kluwin, Thomas N.
    AMERICAN ANNALS OF THE DEAF, 2006, 151 (02) : 93 - 94