Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

被引:4
|
作者
Rundle, Kiata [1 ]
Curtis, Guy J. [2 ]
Clare, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Law, Discipline Psychol, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; Reasons; Personality; Individual differences; Autonomy; Grit; Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Norms; Motivation; DARK TRIAD; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-INTEGRITY; RATIONAL CHOICE; DIRTY DOZEN; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; MORALITY; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00132-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating - students outsourcing assignments to ghost-writers and submitting it as their own - is an issue facing tertiary education institutions globally. Approximately 3% to 11% of higher education students may engage on contract cheating. Understanding why nearly 90% of students do not engage in contract cheating is as important as understanding why other students do, as it can aid in the development of effective interventions and policies. This study addressed limitations in previous research and built upon a measure of Reasons for Not Contract Cheating (RNCC). In this study, 403 university students participated in an online survey consisting of a revised version of the Reasons for Not Contract Cheating measure (RNCC-R) and measures of psychological individual differences, such as the dark triad personality traits, self-control, and autonomy. Two higher-order factors and six sub-factors were identified in the RNCC-R, which included some similarities to the original RNCC. The findings from this study demonstrate the importance of psychological individual differences, such as satisfaction of the need for autonomy, grit (perseverance of effort), and Machiavellianism, in predicting the reasons why students do not engage in contract cheating. Consistent with previous research, this study provides support for the importance of students' motivation for learning, and their perceived morals and norms, as reasons for not engaging in contract cheating. It additionally provides evidence of the importance of the academic environment, such as respect for academic staff, as a reason why students do not engage in contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Why We Should Take a Closer Look at Gestures
    Walther, Sebastian
    Mittal, Vijay A.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (02) : 259 - 261
  • [22] Why Do People Engage In Roth Conversions?
    Goodman, Lucas
    Schramm, Heidi R.
    NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2023, 76 (03) : 561 - 592
  • [23] WHY DO PATIENTS ENGAGE IN MEDICAL TOURISM?
    Carrera, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A323 - A323
  • [24] Why do patients engage in medical tourism?
    Runnels, Vivien
    Carrera, P. M.
    MATURITAS, 2012, 73 (04) : 300 - 304
  • [25] Why do bacteria engage in homologous recombination?
    Vos, Michiel
    TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 17 (06) : 226 - 232
  • [26] CHEATING IN MEDICAL SCHOOL EXAMS Why students might find it difficult to recognise "cheating"
    Collins, Kathleen
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 351
  • [27] Cheating, Dishonesty, and Manipulation: Why Bright Kids Do It
    Calikoglu, Burcu Seher
    ROEPER REVIEW-A JOURNAL ON GIFTED EDUCATION, 2018, 40 (03): : 208 - 210
  • [28] Why Do We Deliver? A Closer Look at Indicated Deliveries Scheduled Less Than 39 Weeks
    Jackson, David N.
    Kirgan, Marsha Matsunaga
    Patil, Pooja
    Brar, Bobby
    Parr, Ashley
    Belilovets, Anastasia
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 220S - 220S
  • [29] How and why teachers engage students with data
    Jimerson, Jo Beth
    Cho, Vincent
    Scroggins, Kimberly A.
    Balial, Ritu
    Robinson, Reginald R.
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2019, 45 (06) : 667 - 691
  • [30] Why students withdraw or continue their educational careers: a closer look at differences in study approaches and personal reasons
    Van Bragt, Cyrille
    Bakx, Anouke
    Teune, Peter
    Bergen, Theo
    Croon, Marcel
    JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING, 2011, 63 (02): : 217 - 233