Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look

被引:4
|
作者
Rundle, Kiata [1 ]
Curtis, Guy J. [2 ]
Clare, Joseph [3 ]
机构
[1] Murdoch Univ, Sch Law, Discipline Psychol, South St, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Law, 35 Stirling Hwy, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
关键词
Contract cheating; Reasons; Personality; Individual differences; Autonomy; Grit; Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Norms; Motivation; DARK TRIAD; SELF-EFFICACY; ACADEMIC-INTEGRITY; RATIONAL CHOICE; DIRTY DOZEN; PERSONALITY; VALIDATION; ATTITUDES; MORALITY; GRADES;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00132-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Contract cheating - students outsourcing assignments to ghost-writers and submitting it as their own - is an issue facing tertiary education institutions globally. Approximately 3% to 11% of higher education students may engage on contract cheating. Understanding why nearly 90% of students do not engage in contract cheating is as important as understanding why other students do, as it can aid in the development of effective interventions and policies. This study addressed limitations in previous research and built upon a measure of Reasons for Not Contract Cheating (RNCC). In this study, 403 university students participated in an online survey consisting of a revised version of the Reasons for Not Contract Cheating measure (RNCC-R) and measures of psychological individual differences, such as the dark triad personality traits, self-control, and autonomy. Two higher-order factors and six sub-factors were identified in the RNCC-R, which included some similarities to the original RNCC. The findings from this study demonstrate the importance of psychological individual differences, such as satisfaction of the need for autonomy, grit (perseverance of effort), and Machiavellianism, in predicting the reasons why students do not engage in contract cheating. Consistent with previous research, this study provides support for the importance of students' motivation for learning, and their perceived morals and norms, as reasons for not engaging in contract cheating. It additionally provides evidence of the importance of the academic environment, such as respect for academic staff, as a reason why students do not engage in contract cheating.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why students do not engage in contract cheating: a closer look
    Kiata Rundle
    Guy J. Curtis
    Joseph Clare
    International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19
  • [2] Why Students Do Not Engage in Contract Cheating
    Rundle, Kiata
    Curtis, Guy J.
    Clare, Joseph
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [3] Writing Instruction in Elementary Classrooms: Why Teachers Engage or do not Engage Students in Writing
    Harward, Stan
    Peterson, Nancy
    Korth, Byran
    Wimmer, Jennifer
    Wilcox, Brad
    Morrison, Timothy G.
    Black, Sharon
    Simmerman, Sue
    Pierce, Linda
    LITERACY RESEARCH AND INSTRUCTION, 2014, 53 (03) : 205 - 224
  • [4] A closer look at ESOL teacher advocacy: What we do and why
    Linville, Heather A.
    TESOL JOURNAL, 2020, 11 (03)
  • [5] Cheating in College-Why Students Do It and What Educators Can Do About It
    Simha, Aditya
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION, 2014, 13 (01) : 143 - 145
  • [6] Why students engage in cyber-cheating through a collective movement: A case of deviance and collusion
    Parks, Rachida F.
    Lowry, Paul Benjamin
    Wigand, Rolf T.
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Williams, Therese L.
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 125 : 308 - 326
  • [7] Contract cheating: a survey of Australian university students
    Bretag, Tracey
    Harper, Rowena
    Burton, Michael
    Ellis, Cath
    Newton, Philip
    Rozenberg, Pearl
    Saddiqui, Sonia
    van Haeringen, Karen
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2019, 44 (11) : 1837 - 1856
  • [8] Students do Research at the PTS: A closer Look at the Influence of Adhesives and Metallization on Recyclability
    Geissler, Marie
    Wortmann, Vanessa
    Bohmer, Christiane
    Eisenschmidt, Annika
    WOCHENBLATT FUR PAPIERFABRIKATION, 2021, 149 (06): : 18 - 19
  • [9] Why Do Social Work Students Engage in Lesbian and Gay Rights Activism?
    Swank, Eric
    Fahs, Breanne
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN BEHAVIOR IN THE SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 23 (01) : 91 - 106
  • [10] CONTRACT CHEATING: WHAT DO STUDENT ADVOCATES THINK?
    Sutherland-Smith, Wendy
    Dawson, Phillip
    Walker, Helen
    PLAGIARISM ACROSS EUROPE AND BEYOND 2017, 2017, : 230 - 230