Effectiveness and Safety of EUS Rendezvous After Failed Biliary Cannulation With ERCP A Systematic Review and Proportion Meta-analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Klair, Jagpal S. [1 ]
Zafar, Yousaf [2 ]
Ashat, Munish [3 ]
Bomman, Shivanand [1 ]
Murali, Arvind R. [3 ]
Jayaraj, Mahendran [4 ]
Law, Joanna [1 ]
Larsen, Michael [1 ]
Singh, Dhruv P. [5 ]
Rustagi, Tarun [6 ]
Irani, Shayan [1 ]
Ross, Andrew [1 ]
Kozarek, Richard [1 ]
Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Digest Dis Inst, Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Internal Med, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Clin, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Las Vegas, NV USA
[5] Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albuquerque, NM USA
[7] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词
failed ERCP; EUS rendezvous; biliary cannulation; safety; efficacy; DRAINAGE; QUALITY; ACCESS; MULTICENTER; OBSTRUCTION;
D O I
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001543
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an alternative to interventional radiology-guided rendezvous ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. However, there is significant variation in reported rates of success and adverse events associated with EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. We performed a systematic review and a proportion meta-analysis to reliably assess the effectiveness and safety of the EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Materials and Methods:We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings (from inception through August 2020) to identify studies reporting EUS-RV-assisted ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP techniques. Using the random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird, we calculated the pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Results:Twelve studies reporting a total of 342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of technical success (12 studies reporting a total of 342 patients) was 86.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 78.4-91.3]. The pooled rate of clinical success (4 studies reporting a total of 94 patients) was 80.8% (95% CI: 64.1-90.8). The pooled rate of overall adverse events (12 studies; 42 events in 342 patients) was 14% (95% CI: 10.5-18.4). Low to moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analyses. Conclusions:EUS-RV-assisted ERCP appears to be effective and safe in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. Given the risk of adverse events, it should be performed in centers with expertise in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EUS-GUIDED VERSUS ERCP-GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE FOR PRIMARY PALLIATION OF MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Jin, Zheng
    Zhang, Xiaofeng
    GUT, 2019, 68 : A123 - A124
  • [32] Double-guidewire technique in difficult biliary cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tse, Frances
    Yuan, Yuhong
    Moayyedi, Paul
    Leontiadis, Grigorios I.
    Barkun, Alan N.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (01) : 15 - 26
  • [33] EUS-GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE IS EQUIVALENT TO ERCP FOR PRIMARY TREATMENT OF MALIGNANT DISTAL BILIARY OBSTRUCTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF PRIMARY EUS-GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE
    Bazarbashi, Ahmad Najdat
    Hathorn, Kelly
    Sack, Jordan
    McCarty, Thomas R.
    Wang, Thomas J.
    Chan, Walter W.
    Thompson, Christopher C.
    Ryou, Marvin
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 89 (06) : AB329 - AB329
  • [34] Single Session EUS-Rendezvous ERCP Versus Percutaneous Biliary Drainage in Patients With Failed Common Bile Duct Access After ERCP
    Teoh, Anthony Y.
    Iwashita, Takuji
    Mukai, Tsuyoshi
    Dhir, Vinay K.
    Maydeo, Amit P.
    Chan, Francis K. L.
    Lau, James Y.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB533 - AB533
  • [35] EUS Guided Rendezvous for Biliary Access for Bile Duct Stone in Small Duct, After Outside Failed ERCP with Post ERCP Pancreatitis and Perforation
    Attam, Rajeev
    Arain, Mustafa
    Freeman, Martin L.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 75 (04) : 113 - 114
  • [36] Comparison between different advanced cannulation techniques for difficult biliary cannulation: a systematic review with a meta-analysis
    Wang, Liangjing
    Wang, Limin
    Huang, Nan
    Li, Tian
    Shi, Xiaohua
    Zhu, Qilin
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [37] EUS-GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE VERSUS ERCP GUIDED BILIARY DRAINAGE AS PRIMARY THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT BILIARY OBSTRUCTION - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Bomman, Shivanand
    Trieu, Richard
    Hart, Maxwell
    Witten, Brandon
    Rodden, Diane
    Chauhan, Mahak
    Kim, Joseph
    Aggarwal, Avin
    Gavini, Hemanth
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB931 - AB932
  • [38] Prone ERCP is Associated with Higher Successful Cannulation Rates Compared to Supine ERCP: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Musa, Rasheed
    Makahleh, Asaiel
    Alnasarat, Ahmad
    Kloub, Mohammad N.
    Almasaid, Sharifeh
    Darweesh, Mohammad
    Abdel-razeq, Rashid
    Asif, Hamza
    Young, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1167 - S1168
  • [39] PRE-CUT PAPILLOTOMY VS EUS-RENDEZVOUS- A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Iqbal, Amna
    Ahmed, Zohaib
    Zerihun, Kirubel
    Gangwani, Manesh
    Stanley, Sara
    Renno, Anas
    Hassan, Mona
    Alastal, Yaseen
    Nawras, Ali
    Javaid, Tossef
    Kobeissy, Abdallah
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (07) : 94 - 94
  • [40] Safety and Efficacy of Trans-Luminal Biliary Drainage Using the Choledochduodenostomy vs Hepaticogastrostomy After Failed ERCP. Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdelfatah, Mohamed M.
    Harvin, Glenn
    Ali, Eslam G.
    Movahed, Hossein
    Vos, Paul
    Raina, Amit
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2016, 83 (05) : AB599 - AB599