共 50 条
Effectiveness and Safety of EUS Rendezvous After Failed Biliary Cannulation With ERCP A Systematic Review and Proportion Meta-analysis
被引:21
|作者:
Klair, Jagpal S.
[1
]
Zafar, Yousaf
[2
]
Ashat, Munish
[3
]
Bomman, Shivanand
[1
]
Murali, Arvind R.
[3
]
Jayaraj, Mahendran
[4
]
Law, Joanna
[1
]
Larsen, Michael
[1
]
Singh, Dhruv P.
[5
]
Rustagi, Tarun
[6
]
Irani, Shayan
[1
]
Ross, Andrew
[1
]
Kozarek, Richard
[1
]
Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh
[1
,7
]
机构:
[1] Digest Dis Inst, Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Cent Florida, Dept Internal Med, Orlando, FL USA
[3] Univ Iowa Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Clin, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Univ Nevada, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Las Vegas, NV USA
[5] Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ New Mexico, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Albuquerque, NM USA
[7] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词:
failed ERCP;
EUS rendezvous;
biliary cannulation;
safety;
efficacy;
DRAINAGE;
QUALITY;
ACCESS;
MULTICENTER;
OBSTRUCTION;
D O I:
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001543
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided rendezvous (EUS-RV) endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an alternative to interventional radiology-guided rendezvous ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. However, there is significant variation in reported rates of success and adverse events associated with EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. We performed a systematic review and a proportion meta-analysis to reliably assess the effectiveness and safety of the EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Materials and Methods:We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings (from inception through August 2020) to identify studies reporting EUS-RV-assisted ERCP in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP techniques. Using the random-effects model described by DerSimonian and Laird, we calculated the pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of EUS-RV-assisted ERCP. Results:Twelve studies reporting a total of 342 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of technical success (12 studies reporting a total of 342 patients) was 86.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 78.4-91.3]. The pooled rate of clinical success (4 studies reporting a total of 94 patients) was 80.8% (95% CI: 64.1-90.8). The pooled rate of overall adverse events (12 studies; 42 events in 342 patients) was 14% (95% CI: 10.5-18.4). Low to moderate heterogeneity was noted in the analyses. Conclusions:EUS-RV-assisted ERCP appears to be effective and safe in patients who failed biliary cannulation with conventional ERCP. Given the risk of adverse events, it should be performed in centers with expertise in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文