Decomposition analysis and decoupling effects of factors driving carbon emissions produced by electricity generation

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Hang [1 ]
Liu, Qing [1 ]
He, Rui [1 ]
Li, Feng [1 ]
Lu, Li [2 ]
机构
[1] China Elect Power Planning & Engn Inst, Beijing 100120, Peoples R China
[2] North China Elect Power Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Carbon emissions; GDI model; Tapio decoupling effect; Yellow River Basin; CO2; EMISSIONS; POWER INDUSTRY; ENERGY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.02.020
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Development of a low-carbon power industry in the Yellow River Basin is crucial for developing the "double- carbon" strategy. Previous studies have failed to consider the decomposition of carbon emissions and ignored the decoupling effect of power output and carbon emissions in the Yellow River Basin. This study constructs a Generalized Divisia Index (GDI) model to quantify the contribution of factors driving carbon emission changes in the eight provinces of the Yellow River Basin during 2005-2021. Further, the decoupling dynamics between carbon emissions and electricity output are analyzed based on the Tapio decoupling model. The factors contributing to the CO2 emissions were energy structure and energy consumption, which contributed average rates of 73.1% and 52.4%. That played a dampening role was electricity carbon reduction technology, with -22.5%. Power structure was the main driver for the enhancement in CO2 emissions, contributing 727.9 (100Mt). The reduction factor was the carbon intensity of electricity (-191.3 (100Mt)). Henan made the smallest contribution to carbon emissions and Ningxia made the largest.The provinces in the Yellow River Basin have weak decoupling and expansive coupling; electricity cost is negatively related to the decoupling index, and carbon emissions and electricity output decouple when electricity cost rises.
引用
收藏
页码:2692 / 2703
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Decoupling and Decomposition Analysis of Carbon Emissions from Electric Output in the United States
    Jiang, Xue-Ting
    Li, Rongrong
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (06)
  • [42] Analysis of the carbon emissions trend in the Indian manufacturing sector: a decomposition and decoupling approach
    Sharma, Himja
    Padhi, Balakrushna
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (35) : 48205 - 48221
  • [43] Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis
    Wang, Qunwei
    Chiu, Yung-Ho
    Chiu, Ching-Ren
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 51 : 252 - 260
  • [44] Analysis of the carbon emissions trend in European Union. A decomposition and decoupling approach
    Bianco, Vincenzo
    Cascetta, Furio
    Nardini, Sergio
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 909
  • [45] Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China's regional thermal electricity generation, 2000-2020
    Yan, Qingyou
    Zhang, Qian
    Zou, Xin
    ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 788 - 794
  • [46] An analysis of the decomposition and driving force of carbon emissions in transport sector in China
    Jing Gu
    Shuhua Jiang
    Jing Zhang
    Jinde Jiang
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [47] Driving forces of household carbon emissions in China: A spatial decomposition analysis
    Yuan, Rong
    Rodrigues, Joao F. D.
    Behrens, Paul
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 233 : 932 - 945
  • [48] Decoupling between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from China
    Zhao, Xiaochun
    Jiang, Mei
    Zhang, Wei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
  • [49] Correction to: Characteristics, decoupling effect, and driving factors of regional tourism’s carbon emissions in China
    Guobao Xiong
    Junhong Deng
    Baogen Ding
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 47094 - 47094
  • [50] Decomposition analysis of the greenhouse gas emissions in Korea's electricity generation sector
    Kim, Suyi
    Kim, Sung-Kyun
    CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2016, 7 (5-6) : 249 - 260