Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study

被引:6
|
作者
Alessandri, Franco [1 ]
Centurioni, Maria Grazia [1 ]
Perrone, Umberto [1 ]
Evangelisti, Giulio [1 ]
Urso, Claudia [1 ,2 ]
Paratore, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Guida, Elisabetta [1 ,2 ]
Nappini, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Gustavino, Claudio [1 ]
Ferrero, Simone [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barra, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Largo R Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词
barbed suture; cesarean scar defects; dysmenorrhea; fishbone suture; monofilament suture; postmenstrual spotting; uterine niches; PREVALENCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ULTRASOUND; SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.14744
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures. MethodsThis case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. ResultsIn all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050). ConclusionThe use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 905
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sardo, A. Di Spiezio
    Saccone, G.
    Mccurdy, R.
    Bujold, E.
    Bifulco, G.
    Berghella, V.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05) : 578 - 583
  • [32] Purse-string double-layer closure: A novel technique for repairing the uterine incision during cesarean section
    Turan, Cem
    Buyukbayrak, Esra Esim
    Yilmaz, Aylin Onan
    Karsidag, Yasemin Karageyim
    Pirimoglu, Meltem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (04) : 565 - 574
  • [33] Single- vs. double-layer uterine incision closure at primary cesarean section and adhesion formation
    Blumenfeld, Yair
    Caughey, Aaron
    El-Sayed, Yasser
    Daniels, Kay
    Lyell, Deirdre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 197 (06) : S77 - S77
  • [34] Single- versus double-layer closure of the hysterotomy incision during cesarean delivery and risk of uterine rupture
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boutin, Amelie
    Moore, Lynne
    Jastrow, Nicole
    Brassard, Normand
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Hudic, Igor
    Shipp, Thomas D.
    Weimar, Charlotte H. E.
    Fatusic, Zlatan
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 115 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [35] Comparison of the primary cesarean hysterotomy scars after single- and double-layer interrupted closure
    Kataoka, Soromon
    Tanuma, Fumie
    Iwaki, Yutaka
    Iwaki, Kurumi
    Fujii, Takeru
    Fujimoto, Toshio
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (12) : 1352 - 1358
  • [36] Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Uterine Closure at the Time of Cesarean and Subsequent Risks in Those With Placenta Accreta Spectrum
    Phelps, Alexandra
    Harrison, Rachel
    Holmgren, Calla
    Hussein, Nada
    Steinberg, Guy
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 57S - 57S
  • [37] Comparison of initial leak pressures after single- and double-layer cystotomy closure with barbed and nonbarbed monofilament suture material in an ex vivo ovine model
    Duffy, Daniel J.
    Kindra, Cameron G.
    Moore, George E.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2019, 48 (03) : 424 - 430
  • [38] Comment on "Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial"
    Scioscia, Marco
    Iannone, Piergiorgio
    Morano, Danila
    Pontrelli, Giovanni
    Greco, Pantaleo
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (05) : 629 - 629
  • [39] Impact of single- vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 211 (05) : 453 - 460
  • [40] Re: Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Rozenberg, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (05)