Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study

被引:6
|
作者
Alessandri, Franco [1 ]
Centurioni, Maria Grazia [1 ]
Perrone, Umberto [1 ]
Evangelisti, Giulio [1 ]
Urso, Claudia [1 ,2 ]
Paratore, Marco [1 ,2 ]
Guida, Elisabetta [1 ,2 ]
Nappini, Alice [1 ,2 ]
Gustavino, Claudio [1 ]
Ferrero, Simone [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Barra, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[2] Univ Genoa, Dept Neurosci Rehabil Ophthalmol Genet Maternal &, Genoa, Italy
[3] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Genoa, Italy
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Acad Unit Obstet & Gynecol, Largo R Benzi 10, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
关键词
barbed suture; cesarean scar defects; dysmenorrhea; fishbone suture; monofilament suture; postmenstrual spotting; uterine niches; PREVALENCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ULTRASOUND; SECTION;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.14744
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare the ultrasonographic features of uterine scars and clinical symptoms after cesarean delivery (CD) using barbed and conventional smooth sutures. MethodsThis case-control study enrolled women who underwent primary CD at 37 weeks of pregnancy or later. The uterus was closed using either double-layer unidirectional barbed suture or conventional double-layer smooth suture. Ultrasound scans of the uterine scar and evaluations of menstrual patterns were performed at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. ResultsIn all, 102 patients underwent uterine closure with barbed suture, while 135 patients underwent smooth suture. At 6 months, patients in the barbed group had a lower incidence of uterine niches (20.2% vs 32.6%) that were also shallower in depth (P < 0.001). Lower incidence of niches was also observed in the barbed group at 12 and 24 months (P = 0.043 and 0.048, respectively). At these two follow-up times, the smooth group had a higher number of patients reporting postmenstrual spotting (P < 0.05) and more postmenstrual spotting days per month (P < 0.050). ConclusionThe use of double-layer barbed suture during CD was associated with a lower incidence of scar niches and a more favorable menstrual pattern compared with the use of smooth suture.
引用
收藏
页码:895 / 905
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Uterine rupture, perioperative and perinatal morbidity after single-layer and double-layer closure at cesarean delivery
    Durnwald, C
    Mercer, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 925 - 929
  • [12] Barbed versus conventional suture for uterine closure during cesarean section: An integrated retrospective study
    Sandoval-Herrera, Carlos
    Litvinova, Katerina
    Ljubic, Zorica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S665 - S665
  • [13] Ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic outcomes of uterine scar healing after cesarean section: Comparison of two types of single-layer suture
    Ceci, Oronzo
    Cantatore, Clementina
    Scioscia, Marco
    Nardelli, Claudia
    Ravi, Mini
    Vimercati, Antonella
    Bettocchi, Stefano
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2012, 38 (11) : 1302 - 1307
  • [15] Single- or double-layer uterine closure techniques following cesarean: A randomized trial
    Yilmaz Baran, Safak
    Kalayci, Hakan
    Dogan Durdag, Gulsen
    Yetkinel, Selcuk
    Alemdaroglu, Songul
    cok, Tayfun
    Bulgan Kilicdag, Esra
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (03) : 531 - 537
  • [16] Fishbone double-layer barbed suture in cesarean section: a help in preventing long-term obstetric sequelae?
    Franco Alessandri
    Giulio Evangelisti
    Maria Grazia Centurioni
    Claudio Gustavino
    Simone Ferrero
    Fabio Barra
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 573 - 576
  • [17] Fishbone double-layer barbed suture in cesarean section: a help in preventing long-term obstetric sequelae?
    Alessandri, Franco
    Evangelisti, Giulio
    Centurioni, Maria Grazia
    Gustavino, Claudio
    Ferrero, Simone
    Barra, Fabio
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (03) : 573 - 576
  • [18] Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy
    Vachon-Marceau, Chantale
    Demers, Suzanne
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Gauthier, Robert J.
    Pasquier, Jean-Charles
    Girard, Mario
    Chaillet, Nils
    Boulvain, Michel
    Jastrow, Nicole
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (01) : 65.e1 - 65.e5
  • [19] Trial of labor outcomes after knotless-barbed vs. conventional suture for closure of cesarean uterine incision
    Persky, Michal Novoselsky
    Peled, Tzuria
    Weiss, Ari
    Sela, Hen Y.
    Grisaru, Sorina Granovsky
    Ashwal, Eran
    Rottenstreich, Misgav
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 230 (01) : S441 - S442
  • [20] The Never Ending Debate Single-Layer Versus Double-Layer Closure of the Uterine Incision at Cesarean Section
    Hegde, C. V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2014, 64 (04): : 239 - 240