Effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component retroversion on acromial strain

被引:1
|
作者
O'Leary, Michael [1 ]
Haislup, Brett [1 ]
Gillin, Thomas [1 ]
Abbasi, Pooyan [1 ]
Austin, Luke [2 ]
Wright, Melissa [1 ]
Murthi, Anand M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shoulder & Elbow Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Biomechanics; shoulder; scapular spine; acromion; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; acromial stress fracture; GLENOSPHERE DESIGN; OUTCOMES; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Acromion and scapular spine stress fractures can be catastrophic complications following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A variety of host, implant, and technical factors have been identified that increase the risk of this complication. The glenoid component in particular has been closely evaluated for its impact on rates of stress fractures following RSA. The goal of this biomechanical study is to evaluate if humeral stem version has an impact on acromion and scapular spine strain after RSA. Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a custom dynamic shoulder frame. Commercially available RSA components were implanted with the humeral component inserted in 0 degrees of retroversion. Acromion and scapular spine strain were measured at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction using strain rosettes secured to the acromion and scapular spine in the typical locations for Levy type II and type III stress fractures, respectively. The humeral stem was then removed and reimplanted in 30 degrees of retroversion and the measurements were repeated. Student t test was performed to analyze the relationship between humeral stem version and acromion and scapular spine strain at various abduction angles. Results: Strain at the both the acromion and scapular spine were found to have no significant difference at any abduction angle when comparing 0 degrees and 30 degrees version of the humeral stem. With 0 degrees and 30 degrees versions pooled together, there is significantly lower acromion and scapular spine strain at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction (strain at 0 degrees abduction - strain at 60 degrees abduction: acromion 313.1 m.; P <.0409, Scapular spine 304.9 m.; P <.0407). There was no significant difference in strain at either location when comparing 0 degrees of abduction to 30 degrees of abduction and when comparing 30 degrees of abduction to 60 degrees of abduction. Conclusions: This biomechanical study found no significant difference in scapular spine and acromion strain after RSA when comparing variations in humeral stem version. There does appear to be lower strain at both the acromion and scapular spine at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction regardless of stem version. Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics (C) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S69 / S74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for primary humeral head fractures
    Reuther F.
    Obere Extremität, 2019, 14 (3) : 212 - 213
  • [42] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem
    Ehud Atoun
    Alexander Van Tongel
    Nir Hous
    Ali Narvani
    Jai Relwani
    Ruben Abraham
    Ofer Levy
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 1213 - 1218
  • [43] The effect of proximal humeral bone loss on revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Stephens, Scott P.
    Paisley, Kevin C.
    Giveans, M. Russell
    Wirth, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1519 - 1526
  • [44] HUMERUS RETROVERSION AND SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY
    HERNIGOU, P
    DUPARC, F
    FILALI, C
    REVUE DE CHIRURGIE ORTHOPEDIQUE ET REPARATRICE DE L APPAREIL MOTEUR, 1995, 81 (05): : 419 - 427
  • [45] Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Dedy, Nicolas J.
    Stangenberg, Martin
    Liem, Dennis
    Hurschler, Christof
    Simmen, Beat
    Riner, Marc
    Marquardt, Bjoern
    Steinbeck, Joern
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (04) : 549 - 554
  • [46] Effect of posterior offset humeral components on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Nicolas J. Dedy
    Martin Stangenberg
    Dennis Liem
    Christof Hurschler
    Beat Simmen
    Marc Riner
    Bjoern Marquardt
    Joern Steinbeck
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 549 - 554
  • [47] The effect of component positioning on intrinsic stability of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Favre, Philippe
    Sussmann, Patrick S.
    Gerber, Christian
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (04) : 550 - 556
  • [48] The influence of posture and scapulothoracic orientation on the choice of humeral component retrotorsion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Moroder, Philipp
    Akguen, Doruk
    Plachel, Fabian
    Baur, Alexander D. J.
    Siegert, Paul
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2020, 29 (10) : 1992 - 2001
  • [49] Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Berglund, Derek D.
    Mijic, Dragomir
    Law, Tsun Yee
    Kurowicki, Jennifer
    Rosas, Samuel
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2019, 28 (03) : 496 - 502
  • [50] Effects of the humeral tray component positioning for onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty design: a biomechanical analysis
    Berhouet, Julien
    Kontaxis, Andreas
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    Craig, Edward
    Warren, Russel
    Dines, Joshua
    Dines, David
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (04) : 569 - 577