Effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component retroversion on acromial strain

被引:1
|
作者
O'Leary, Michael [1 ]
Haislup, Brett [1 ]
Gillin, Thomas [1 ]
Abbasi, Pooyan [1 ]
Austin, Luke [2 ]
Wright, Melissa [1 ]
Murthi, Anand M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shoulder & Elbow Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Biomechanics; shoulder; scapular spine; acromion; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; acromial stress fracture; GLENOSPHERE DESIGN; OUTCOMES; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Acromion and scapular spine stress fractures can be catastrophic complications following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A variety of host, implant, and technical factors have been identified that increase the risk of this complication. The glenoid component in particular has been closely evaluated for its impact on rates of stress fractures following RSA. The goal of this biomechanical study is to evaluate if humeral stem version has an impact on acromion and scapular spine strain after RSA. Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a custom dynamic shoulder frame. Commercially available RSA components were implanted with the humeral component inserted in 0 degrees of retroversion. Acromion and scapular spine strain were measured at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction using strain rosettes secured to the acromion and scapular spine in the typical locations for Levy type II and type III stress fractures, respectively. The humeral stem was then removed and reimplanted in 30 degrees of retroversion and the measurements were repeated. Student t test was performed to analyze the relationship between humeral stem version and acromion and scapular spine strain at various abduction angles. Results: Strain at the both the acromion and scapular spine were found to have no significant difference at any abduction angle when comparing 0 degrees and 30 degrees version of the humeral stem. With 0 degrees and 30 degrees versions pooled together, there is significantly lower acromion and scapular spine strain at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction (strain at 0 degrees abduction - strain at 60 degrees abduction: acromion 313.1 m.; P <.0409, Scapular spine 304.9 m.; P <.0407). There was no significant difference in strain at either location when comparing 0 degrees of abduction to 30 degrees of abduction and when comparing 30 degrees of abduction to 60 degrees of abduction. Conclusions: This biomechanical study found no significant difference in scapular spine and acromion strain after RSA when comparing variations in humeral stem version. There does appear to be lower strain at both the acromion and scapular spine at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction regardless of stem version. Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics (C) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S69 / S74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: the role of the acromial morphology and a comparison of clinical outcomes
    Haidamous, Georges
    Merimee, Stephanie
    Simon, Peter
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Mighell, Mark A.
    Gorman, R. Allen, II
    Frankle, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2022, 31 (06) : S34 - S43
  • [32] Humeral Stem Design in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Lehman, Andrew C.
    Su, Favian
    Feeley, Brian T.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2024, 17 (12) : 616 - 624
  • [33] REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
    George, Michael S.
    Khazzam, Michael
    Chin, Paul
    Dumont, Guillaume
    Russell, Robert
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [34] The biomechanical effects of acromial fracture angulation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Lee, Jae-Hoo
    Kim, Seong Hun
    Baek, Gyurim
    Nakla, Andrew
    Kwak, Daniel
    Mcgarry, Michelle
    Lee, Thay Q.
    Shin, Sang-Jin
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2023, 32 (11) : 2382 - 2388
  • [35] Implant positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has an impact on acromial stresses
    Wong, Murray T.
    Langohr, G. Daniel G.
    Athwal, George S.
    Johnson, James A.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (11) : 1889 - 1895
  • [36] Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
    Craig, Edward
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 16 (04): : 99 - 102
  • [37] Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Humeral Lateralisation: A Systematic Review
    Dhillon, Govind
    Warren, Madeline
    Assiotis, Angelos
    Rumian, Adam
    Uppal, Harpal S.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [38] Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Willis, Matthew
    Min, William
    Brooks, Jordan P.
    Mulieri, Philip
    Walker, Matthew
    Pupello, Derek
    Frankle, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (04) : 507 - 513
  • [39] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Wall, Bryan
    Walch, Gilles
    HAND CLINICS, 2007, 23 (04) : 425 - +
  • [40] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a short metaphyseal humeral stem
    Atoun, Ehud
    Van Tongel, Alexander
    Hous, Nir
    Narvani, Ali
    Relwani, Jai
    Abraham, Ruben
    Levy, Ofer
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (06) : 1213 - 1218