Effect of reverse shoulder arthroplasty humeral component retroversion on acromial strain

被引:1
|
作者
O'Leary, Michael [1 ]
Haislup, Brett [1 ]
Gillin, Thomas [1 ]
Abbasi, Pooyan [1 ]
Austin, Luke [2 ]
Wright, Melissa [1 ]
Murthi, Anand M. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Union Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shoulder & Elbow Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Rothman Orthopaed Inst, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Biomechanics; shoulder; scapular spine; acromion; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; acromial stress fracture; GLENOSPHERE DESIGN; OUTCOMES; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Acromion and scapular spine stress fractures can be catastrophic complications following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). A variety of host, implant, and technical factors have been identified that increase the risk of this complication. The glenoid component in particular has been closely evaluated for its impact on rates of stress fractures following RSA. The goal of this biomechanical study is to evaluate if humeral stem version has an impact on acromion and scapular spine strain after RSA. Methods: Eight cadaveric specimens were tested on a custom dynamic shoulder frame. Commercially available RSA components were implanted with the humeral component inserted in 0 degrees of retroversion. Acromion and scapular spine strain were measured at 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction using strain rosettes secured to the acromion and scapular spine in the typical locations for Levy type II and type III stress fractures, respectively. The humeral stem was then removed and reimplanted in 30 degrees of retroversion and the measurements were repeated. Student t test was performed to analyze the relationship between humeral stem version and acromion and scapular spine strain at various abduction angles. Results: Strain at the both the acromion and scapular spine were found to have no significant difference at any abduction angle when comparing 0 degrees and 30 degrees version of the humeral stem. With 0 degrees and 30 degrees versions pooled together, there is significantly lower acromion and scapular spine strain at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction (strain at 0 degrees abduction - strain at 60 degrees abduction: acromion 313.1 m.; P <.0409, Scapular spine 304.9 m.; P <.0407). There was no significant difference in strain at either location when comparing 0 degrees of abduction to 30 degrees of abduction and when comparing 30 degrees of abduction to 60 degrees of abduction. Conclusions: This biomechanical study found no significant difference in scapular spine and acromion strain after RSA when comparing variations in humeral stem version. There does appear to be lower strain at both the acromion and scapular spine at 60 degrees of abduction when compared to 0 degrees of abduction regardless of stem version. Level of Evidence: Basic Science Study; Biomechanics (C) 2023 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S69 / S74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Humeral component retroversion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical study
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    Choi, Dan
    Marinello, Patrick
    Knutson, Zakary
    Lipman, Joseph
    Wright, Timothy
    Cordasco, Frank A.
    Craig, Edward V.
    Warren, Russell F.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (09) : 1121 - 1127
  • [2] Does forearm referencing using a retroversion guide achieve the targeted retroversion of the humeral component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Jomaa, Mohammad N.
    Branni, Marco
    Ingoe, Helen
    Pareyon, Roberto
    Italia, Kristine
    Launay, Marine
    Salhi, Asma
    Gilliand, Luke
    Nielsen, James
    Maharaj, Jashint
    Cutbush, Kenneth
    Gupta, Ashish
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (07) : 1555 - 1562
  • [3] Effect of Humeral Component Version on Outcomes in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Aleem, Alexander W.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Austin, Luke S.
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    Krupp, Ryan J.
    Ramsey, Mattatthew L.
    Getz, Charles L.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 40 (03) : 179 - 186
  • [4] Effects of humeral component retroversion on functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    Cho, Nam Su
    Moon, Seong Cheol
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1574 - 1581
  • [5] Influence of retroversion of the humeral component on the lever arm of the teres minor muscle in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Nyffeler, R. W.
    Staudenmann, D.
    Bergmann, M.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2009, 139 (23-24) : 23S - 23S
  • [6] Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A cadaver study
    Berhouet, J.
    Garaud, P.
    Favard, L.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2013, 99 (08) : 887 - 894
  • [7] Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Stephenson, Daniel R.
    Oh, Joo Han
    McGarry, Michelle H.
    Hatch, George F. Rick, III
    Lee, Thay Q.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (04) : 652 - 658
  • [8] Effect of humeral component anteversion on shoulder stability with glenoid component retroversion
    Rama, KRBS
    Apsingi, S
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (11): : 2589 - 2589
  • [9] Is there any influence of humeral component retroversion on range of motion and clinical outcome in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A clinical study
    de Boer F.A.
    van Kampen P.M.
    Huijsmans P.E.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2017, 101 (1) : 85 - 89
  • [10] Evaluation of the role of glenosphere design and humeral component retroversion in avoiding scapular notching during reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Berhouet, Julien
    Garaud, Pascal
    Favard, Luc
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (02) : 151 - 158