Fit accuracy of resin crown on a dental model fabricated using fused deposition modeling 3D printing and a polylactic acid filament

被引:9
|
作者
Nagata, Koudai [1 ]
Muromachi, Koichiro [2 ]
Kouzai, Yusuke [3 ]
Inaba, Keitaro [4 ]
Inoue, Erika [5 ]
Fuchigami, Kei [1 ]
Nihei, Tomotaro [6 ]
Atsumi, Mihoko [7 ]
Kimoto, Katsuhiko [7 ]
Kawana, Hiromasa [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, Yokosuka, Japan
[2] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Pulp Biol & Endodont, Yokosuka, Japan
[3] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Educ Planning, Yokosuka, Japan
[4] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral Microbiol, Yokosuka, Japan
[5] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Div Dent Practice support, Yokosuka, Japan
[6] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Clin Biomat, Yokosuka, Japan
[7] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Yokosuka, Japan
[8] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, 82 Inaoka Cho, Yokosuka 2388580, Japan
关键词
Fused deposition modeling; Stereolithography; Polylactic acid; Sustainable development goals; Marginal fit; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; INTERNAL FIT; PLA; RESTORATIONS; PRECISION;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00325
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: We considered the possibility of reducing industrial waste by fabricating and reusing dental models prepared using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer and polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of models fabricated using FDM and PLA. Methods: The same provisional crown was used to check the marginal fit on PLA models prepared using an intraoral scan-ner (IOS) and FDM, plaster models made with silicone impression material and plaster, and resin models prepared using an IOS and stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printer. The marginal fit was measured using micro-computed tomography at four points on the tooth: the buccal center (B), palatal center (P), mesial center (M), and distal center (D) points. Results: At point B, the marginal gaps were 118 +/- 21.7, 62 +/- 16.4, and 50 +/- 26.5 mu m for the PLA, resin, and plaster models, respectively, with a significant difference between the PLA model and the other two. However, the marginal gap at all other measurement points was not significantly different between the models (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We compared the accuracy of the models fabricated using the FDM, SLA, and conventional methods. The combination of FDM and PLA filaments showed no significant differences from the other models, except at point B, indi-cating its usefulness. Therefore, FDM and PLA may become necessary materials for dental treatment in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A recent review on advancements in dimensional accuracy in fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printing
    Equbal, Azhar
    Murmu, Ramesh
    Kumar, Veenit
    Equbal, Md. Asif
    AIMS MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2024, 11 (05) : 950 - 990
  • [32] Biodegradable Poly(Lactic Acid) Nanocomposites for Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing
    Bardot, Madison
    Schulz, Michael D.
    NANOMATERIALS, 2020, 10 (12) : 1 - 20
  • [33] Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters of Polylactic-Co-Glycolic Acid-Based Biodegradable Antibacterial Materials Using Fused Deposition Modeling
    Dou, Dandan
    Wang, Lizhen
    Jin, Kaixiang
    Han, Yingxiang
    Wang, Xiaofei
    Song, Lihua
    Fan, Yubo
    3D PRINTING AND ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2024, 11 (03) : e1343 - e1355
  • [34] The Precision and Accuracy of 3D Printing of Tablets by Fused Deposition Modelling
    Macedo, Joana
    da Costa, Nuno F.
    Vanhoorne, Valerie
    Vervaet, Chris
    Pinto, Joao F.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 111 (10) : 2814 - 2826
  • [35] Optimizing Energy Consumption, Surface Quality, and Production Time in Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid Polymers
    Warke, Shubhada S.
    Puranik, V. S.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2024, 33 (09) : 4492 - 4501
  • [36] Structural Behavior of a Composite Curtain Wall Fabricated by the Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing Method
    Park, Min Jae
    Bae, Jaehoon
    Ju, Young K.
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [37] Generic roughness meta-model in 3D printing by Fused Deposition Modeling
    Asadollahi-Yazdi, Elnaz
    Gardan, Julien
    Lafon, Pascal
    PROGRESS IN ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2022, 7 (02) : 399 - 410
  • [38] Generic roughness meta-model in 3D printing by Fused Deposition Modeling
    Elnaz Asadollahi-Yazdi
    Julien Gardan
    Pascal Lafon
    Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2022, 7 : 399 - 410
  • [39] 3D Printing of Polypropylene Using the Fused Filament Fabrication Technique
    Silva, A. F.
    Carneiro, O. S.
    Gomes, R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL ESAFORM CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL FORMING (ESAFORM 2017), 2017, 1896
  • [40] Impregnation modeling and preparation optimization of continuous glass fiber reinforced polylactic acid filament for 3D printing
    Yu, Liguo
    Chen, Ke
    Xue, Ping
    Cui, Yonghui
    Jia, Mingyin
    POLYMER COMPOSITES, 2021, 42 (11) : 5731 - 5742