Fit accuracy of resin crown on a dental model fabricated using fused deposition modeling 3D printing and a polylactic acid filament

被引:9
|
作者
Nagata, Koudai [1 ]
Muromachi, Koichiro [2 ]
Kouzai, Yusuke [3 ]
Inaba, Keitaro [4 ]
Inoue, Erika [5 ]
Fuchigami, Kei [1 ]
Nihei, Tomotaro [6 ]
Atsumi, Mihoko [7 ]
Kimoto, Katsuhiko [7 ]
Kawana, Hiromasa [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, Yokosuka, Japan
[2] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Pulp Biol & Endodont, Yokosuka, Japan
[3] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Educ Planning, Yokosuka, Japan
[4] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral Microbiol, Yokosuka, Japan
[5] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Div Dent Practice support, Yokosuka, Japan
[6] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Clin Biomat, Yokosuka, Japan
[7] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Fixed Prosthodont, Yokosuka, Japan
[8] Kanagawa Dent Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Implantol, 82 Inaoka Cho, Yokosuka 2388580, Japan
关键词
Fused deposition modeling; Stereolithography; Polylactic acid; Sustainable development goals; Marginal fit; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; INTERNAL FIT; PLA; RESTORATIONS; PRECISION;
D O I
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00325
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: We considered the possibility of reducing industrial waste by fabricating and reusing dental models prepared using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printer and polylactic acid (PLA) filaments. The purpose of this study was to verify the accuracy of models fabricated using FDM and PLA. Methods: The same provisional crown was used to check the marginal fit on PLA models prepared using an intraoral scan-ner (IOS) and FDM, plaster models made with silicone impression material and plaster, and resin models prepared using an IOS and stereolithography apparatus (SLA) 3D printer. The marginal fit was measured using micro-computed tomography at four points on the tooth: the buccal center (B), palatal center (P), mesial center (M), and distal center (D) points. Results: At point B, the marginal gaps were 118 +/- 21.7, 62 +/- 16.4, and 50 +/- 26.5 mu m for the PLA, resin, and plaster models, respectively, with a significant difference between the PLA model and the other two. However, the marginal gap at all other measurement points was not significantly different between the models (P > 0.05). Conclusions: We compared the accuracy of the models fabricated using the FDM, SLA, and conventional methods. The combination of FDM and PLA filaments showed no significant differences from the other models, except at point B, indi-cating its usefulness. Therefore, FDM and PLA may become necessary materials for dental treatment in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 149
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investigation of the Influence of Fused Deposition Modeling 3D Printing Process Parameters on Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Parts Using the Taguchi Method
    Megersa, Getu Koro
    Sitek, Wojciech
    Nowak, Agnieszka J.
    Tomasic, Neven
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (23)
  • [22] 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid Bioplastic-Carbon Fibres and Twisted Kevlar Composites Through Coextrusion Using Fused Deposition Modeling
    Tey, J. Y.
    Yeo, W. H.
    King, Y. J.
    Ding, W. O.
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE MATERIALS, 2020, 8 (12) : 1671 - 1680
  • [23] A Hybrid Dental Model Concept Utilizing Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing 3D Printing
    Lee, Doyun
    Lee, Soo Young
    Kim, Heechul
    Park, Chan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2020, 33 (02) : 229 - 231
  • [24] Improved part strength for the fused deposition 3D printing technique by chemical modification of polylactic acid
    Alturkestany, Mohammed T.
    Panchal, Vishrut
    Thompson, Michael R.
    POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2019, 59 (s2): : E59 - E64
  • [25] Fused filament fabrication 3D printed polylactic acid electroosmotic pumps
    Wu, Liang
    Beirne, Stephen
    Cabot, Joan Marc
    Paull, Brett
    Wallace, Gordon G.
    Innis, Peter C.
    LAB ON A CHIP, 2021, 21 (17) : 3338 - 3351
  • [26] Thermoplastic starch based blends as a highly renewable filament for fused deposition modeling 3D printing
    Ju, Qing
    Tang, Zhipeng
    Shi, Huidong
    Zhu, Yanfeng
    Shen, Yucai
    Wang, Tingwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES, 2022, 219 : 175 - 184
  • [27] Thermoplastic Elastomer for 3D Printing by Fused Deposition Modeling
    M. V. Timoshenko
    S. V. Balabanov
    M. M. Sychev
    D. I. Nikiforov
    Polymer Science, Series A, 2021, 63 : 652 - 656
  • [28] Thermoplastic Elastomer for 3D Printing by Fused Deposition Modeling
    Timoshenko, M., V
    Balabanov, S., V
    Sychev, M. M.
    Nikiforov, D., I
    POLYMER SCIENCE SERIES A, 2021, 63 (06) : 652 - 656
  • [29] Plasticized Protein For 3D Printing By Fused Deposition Modeling
    Chaunier, Laurent
    Leroy, Eric
    Della Valle, Guy
    Lourdin, Denis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH INTERNATIONAL ESAFORM CONFERENCE ON MATERIAL FORMING (ESAFORM 2016), 2016, 1769
  • [30] 3D Printing Of Maize Protein By Fused Deposition Modeling
    Chaunier, Laurent
    Leroy, Eric
    Della Valle, Guy
    Dalgalarrondo, Michele
    Bakan, Benedicte
    Marion, Didier
    Madec, Baptiste
    Lourdin, Denis
    PROCEEDINGS OF PPS-32: THE 32ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE POLYMER PROCESSING SOCIETY, 2017, 1914