Application of Dexmedetomidine as an Opioid Substitute in Opioid-Free Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Dan-hong [1 ]
Xu-Shen [1 ]
Lai, Lan [1 ]
Chen, Yan-jun [1 ]
Liu, Ke [1 ]
Shen, Qi-hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiaxing Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 1882 Zhonghuan South Rd, Jiaxing 315800, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Opioid-free anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS; INTRAOPERATIVE INFUSION; INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; STRESS-RESPONSE; ADULT PATIENTS; REMIFENTANIL; FENTANYL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Opioid-based general anesthesia was previously used to alleviate perioperative pain; however, several complications associated with using anesthesia have raised several concerns. Various studies have investigated the application prospect of using opioid-free general anesthesia, such as dexmedetomidine, as an opioid substitute. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore and highlight the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for opioid-free anesthesia. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We screened for suitable clinical trials from electronic databases, including "PubMed," "Cochrane Library," "EMBASE," and "Web of Science." Eligible trials were included in this meta-analysis. Methods: The quality of the screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was determined using the risk of bias assessment criteria by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used the "Review Manager 5.3" and "Stata 10.0" software to perform the meta-analysis. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" approach. Results: For the analysis, we included 32 RCTs encompassing 2,509 patients. In the opioid-free group, the 2-hour postoperative pain score of patients (mean difference =-0.53, 95% CI:-1.00,-0.07; P = 0.02, I2=78%) was significantly lower compared to those in the opioid-based group. In addition, several patients required rescue analgesia (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.84, P < 0.05, I2 = 71%) and opioids postsurgery. However, the duration of extubation and postanesthesia care unit, as well as the incidences of bradycardia, were high in patients receiving dexmedetomidine as opioid-free general anesthesia. Limitations: Subgroup analysis for different anesthesia-maintaining drugs had not been conducted. The heterogeneity did not reduce after subgroup analysis. Different doses of dexmedetomidine had not been evaluated. Conclusions: These findings indicate that opioid-free general anesthesia based on dexmedetomidine could be effective; however, prolonged extubation time and cardiovascular complications are a few risks associated with dexmedetomidine.
引用
收藏
页码:E635 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analgesic impact of intra-operative opioids vs. opioid-free anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Frauenknecht, J.
    Kirkham, K. R.
    Jacot-Guillarmod, A.
    Albrecht, E.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 74 (05) : 651 - 662
  • [32] A Retrospective Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia versus Opioid Anesthesia for General Cesarean Section
    Enten, Garrett
    Shenouda, Mina A.
    Samuels, David
    Fowler, Naomi
    Balouch, Maha
    Camporesi, Enrico
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [33] Opioid-free anesthesia: a different regard to anesthesia practice
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Estebe, Jean-Pierre
    CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 31 (05) : 556 - 561
  • [34] Safety and effectiveness of multimodal opioid-free anaesthesia for pain and recovery after laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Lin
    Liu, Jiang
    Qin, Sifan
    Geng, Xinyan
    Jing, Li
    Fang, Shirong
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (03):
  • [35] Opioid-free anesthesia—dexmedetomidine as adjuvant in erector spinae plane block: a case series
    Antonio Coviello
    Danilo Esposito
    Roberta Galletta
    Alfredo Maresca
    Giuseppe Servillo
    Journal of Medical Case Reports, 15
  • [36] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stephane, Hublet
    Marianne, Galland
    Julie, Navez
    Patrizia, Loi
    Jean, Closset
    Patrice, Forget
    Pierre, Lafere
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01):
  • [37] Opioid-free versus opioid-based anesthesia in pancreatic surgery
    Stéphane Hublet
    Marianne Galland
    Julie Navez
    Patrizia Loi
    Jean Closset
    Patrice Forget
    Pierre Lafère
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22 (1)
  • [38] Opioid-free Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery: Reply
    Leger, Maxime
    Campfort, Maeva
    Lasocki, Sigismond
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 141 (05)
  • [39] Impact of Opioid-Free Anesthesia on Analgesia and Recovery Following Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Chiu, Chong-Chi
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Liao, Shu-Wei
    Teng, I. -Chia
    Chen, I. -Wen
    Sun, Cheuk-Kwan
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2022, 32 (09) : 3113 - 3124
  • [40] Opioid-free Anesthesia on Quality of Recovery: Comment
    Xue, Fu-Shan
    He, Nong
    Li, Cheng-Wen
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 141 (05)