Application of Dexmedetomidine as an Opioid Substitute in Opioid-Free Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Dan-hong [1 ]
Xu-Shen [1 ]
Lai, Lan [1 ]
Chen, Yan-jun [1 ]
Liu, Ke [1 ]
Shen, Qi-hong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiaxing Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 1882 Zhonghuan South Rd, Jiaxing 315800, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Opioid-free anesthesia; dexmedetomidine; meta-analysis; TOTAL INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PERIOPERATIVE HEMODYNAMICS; INTRAOPERATIVE INFUSION; INDUCED HYPERALGESIA; STRESS-RESPONSE; ADULT PATIENTS; REMIFENTANIL; FENTANYL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Opioid-based general anesthesia was previously used to alleviate perioperative pain; however, several complications associated with using anesthesia have raised several concerns. Various studies have investigated the application prospect of using opioid-free general anesthesia, such as dexmedetomidine, as an opioid substitute. Objectives: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore and highlight the safety and effectiveness of dexmedetomidine as an opioid substitute for opioid-free anesthesia. Study Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Setting: We screened for suitable clinical trials from electronic databases, including "PubMed," "Cochrane Library," "EMBASE," and "Web of Science." Eligible trials were included in this meta-analysis. Methods: The quality of the screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was determined using the risk of bias assessment criteria by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used the "Review Manager 5.3" and "Stata 10.0" software to perform the meta-analysis. We evaluated the quality of evidence using the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation" approach. Results: For the analysis, we included 32 RCTs encompassing 2,509 patients. In the opioid-free group, the 2-hour postoperative pain score of patients (mean difference =-0.53, 95% CI:-1.00,-0.07; P = 0.02, I2=78%) was significantly lower compared to those in the opioid-based group. In addition, several patients required rescue analgesia (risk ratio = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.84, P < 0.05, I2 = 71%) and opioids postsurgery. However, the duration of extubation and postanesthesia care unit, as well as the incidences of bradycardia, were high in patients receiving dexmedetomidine as opioid-free general anesthesia. Limitations: Subgroup analysis for different anesthesia-maintaining drugs had not been conducted. The heterogeneity did not reduce after subgroup analysis. Different doses of dexmedetomidine had not been evaluated. Conclusions: These findings indicate that opioid-free general anesthesia based on dexmedetomidine could be effective; however, prolonged extubation time and cardiovascular complications are a few risks associated with dexmedetomidine.
引用
收藏
页码:E635 / +
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Opioid-free Anesthesia: Reply
    Kharasch, Evan D.
    Clark, J. David
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 135 (04) : 759 - 760
  • [22] Opioid-free anesthesia with interfascial dexmedetomidine in a high-risk infant
    Eizaga Rebollar, Ramon
    Borreiros Rodriguez, Elena
    Delgado Olmos, Irene
    Torres Morera, Luis Miguel
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 15 (04) : 450 - 453
  • [23] Comparison of opioid and opioid-free anesthesia in bariatric surgery
    Yasar, Suekrue Umit
    Yildiz, Asli Mete
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 14 (09): : 825 - 829
  • [24] Narcolepsy and opioid-free anesthesia: a review and case report
    Escalona Belmonte, J. J.
    Romero Molina, S.
    Sepulveda Haro, E.
    Malo Manso, A.
    Guerrero Orriach, J. L.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2021, 68 (03): : 165 - 170
  • [25] Balanced Opioid-free Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine versus Balanced Anesthesia with Remifentanil for Major or Intermediate Noncardiac Surgery: The Postoperative and Opioid-free Anesthesia (POFA) Randomized Clinical Trial
    Beloeil, Helene
    Garot, Matthias
    Lebuffe, Gilles
    Gerbaud, Alexandre
    Bila, Julien
    Cuvillon, Philippe
    Dubout, Elisabeth
    Oger, Sebastien
    Nadaud, Julien
    Becret, Antoine
    Coullier, Nicolas
    Lecoeur, Sylvain
    Fayon, Julie
    Godet, Thomas
    Mazerolles, Michel
    Atallah, Fouad
    Sigaut, Stephanie
    Choinier, Pierre-Marie
    Asehnoune, Karim
    Roquilly, Antoine
    Chanques, Gerald
    Esvan, Maxime
    Futier, Emmanuel
    Laviolle, Bruno
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 134 (04) : 541 - 551
  • [26] Opioid-free anesthesia for adenotonsillectomy in children
    Mann, Glenn E.
    Flamer, Steven Z.
    Nair, Singh
    Maher, James N.
    Cowan, Brandon
    Streiff, Agathe
    Adams, David
    Shaparin, Naum
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [27] Effect of opioid-free anesthesia on the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Zhang, Yanan
    Ma, Dandan
    Lang, Bao
    Zang, Chuanbo
    Sun, Zenggang
    Ren, Shengjie
    Chen, Huayong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (38) : E35126
  • [28] Opioid-free anesthesia for quality of recovery score after surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Di
    Liu, Zhi
    Zhang, Wenhui
    Li, Siru
    Chen, Yutao
    Li, Xingguo
    Bi, Congjie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2025, 103
  • [29] Opioid-Free Analgesia for Supratentorial Craniotomies: A Systematic Review
    Darmawikarta, Denise
    Sourour, Michel
    Couban, Rachel
    Kamath, Sriganesh
    Reddy, Kesava K., V
    Shanthanna, Harsha
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 46 (04) : 415 - 422
  • [30] Opioid-Free Anaesthesia Improves Anaesthesia Recovery when Compared with that of Opioid-Based Anaesthesia. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
    Malo-Manso, Alfredo
    Fontaneda-Heredia, Ana
    Romero-Molina, Salvador
    Sepulveda-Haro, Enrique
    Escalona-Belmonte, Juan Jose
    Guerrero-Orriach, Jose Luis
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2023, 30 (14) : 1667 - 1681