Applications of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review

被引:11
|
作者
Safdar, Afifa [1 ]
Smith, Marie-Claire [2 ]
Byblow, Winston D. [2 ]
Stinear, Cathy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Med, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Exercise Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
stroke; noninvasive brain stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; theta burst stimulation; motor evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1177/15459683231209722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising technique for improving upper limb motor performance post-stroke. Its application has been guided by the interhemispheric competition model and typically involves suppression of contralesional motor cortex. However, the bimodal balance recovery model prompts a more tailored application of NIBS based on ipsilesional corticomotor function. Objective To review and assess the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols that aimed to improve upper limb motor performance after stroke. Methods A PubMed search was conducted for studies published between 1st January 2005 and 1st November 2022 using rTMS to improve upper limb motor performance of human adults after stroke. Studies were grouped according to whether facilitatory or suppressive rTMS was applied to the contralesional hemisphere. Results Of the 492 studies identified, 70 were included in this review. Only 2 studies did not conform to the interhemispheric competition model, and facilitated the contralesional hemisphere. Only 21 out of 70 (30%) studies reported motor evoked potential (MEP) status as a biomarker of ipsilesional corticomotor function. Around half of the studies (37/70, 53%) checked whether rTMS had the expected effect by measuring corticomotor excitability (CME) after application. Conclusion The interhemispheric competition model dominates the application of rTMS post-stroke. The majority of recent and current studies do not consider bimodal balance recovery model for the application of rTMS. Evaluating CME after the application rTMS could confirm that the intervention had the intended neurophysiological effect. Future studies could select patients and apply rTMS protocols based on ipsilesional MEP status.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 849
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transcranial direct current stimulation for motor recovery of upper limb function after stroke
    Luedemann-Podubecka, Jitka
    Boesl, Kathrin
    Rothhardt, Sandra
    Verheyden, Geert
    Nowak, Dennis Alexander
    NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2014, 47 : 245 - 259
  • [32] Effects of High-Frequency (HF) Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review
    Vabalaite, Birute
    Petruseviciene, Laura
    Savickas, Raimondas
    Kubilius, Raimondas
    Ignatavicius, Povilas
    Lendraitiene, Egle
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (11):
  • [33] The effectiveness and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on spasticity after upper motor neuron injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Jin
    Fu, Hui
    Xie, Xiaolong
    Zhong, Dongling
    Li, Yuxi
    Liu, Xiaobo
    Zhang, Huiling
    Zhang, Jun
    Huang, Jiaxi
    Li, Juan
    Jin, Rongjiang
    Zheng, Zhong
    FRONTIERS IN NEURAL CIRCUITS, 2022, 16
  • [34] The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analytical Review
    Tang, I-Ning
    JOURNAL OF FOOD AND DRUG ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [35] Stimulating stimulation: can we improve motor recovery following stroke using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation?
    Ackerley, Suzanne J.
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2010, 15 (04) : 302 - 308
  • [36] Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Graef, Patricia
    Rocha Dadalt, Maria Luisa
    Medeiros da Silva Rodrigues, Daiana Amaral
    Stein, Cinara
    Pagnussat, Aline de Souza
    JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 369 : 149 - 158
  • [37] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb motor performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review
    Michael William Simpson
    Margaret Mak
    Journal of Neurology, 2020, 267 : 3479 - 3488
  • [38] Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on upper limb motor function in stroke: an overview review of the systematic reviews
    Tedla, Jaya Shanker
    Sangadala, Devika Rani
    Reddy, Ravi Shankar
    Gular, Kumar
    Kakaraparthi, Venkata Nagaraj
    Asiri, Faisal
    BRAIN INJURY, 2023, 37 (02) : 122 - 133
  • [39] The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on upper limb motor performance in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review
    Simpson, Michael William
    Mak, Margaret
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2020, 267 (12) : 3479 - 3488
  • [40] Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Stroke-Induced Upper Limb Motor Deficit: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Lan
    Xing, Guoqiang
    Shuai, Shiquan
    Guo, Zhiwei
    Chen, Huaping
    McClure, Morgan A.
    Chen, Xiaojuan
    Mu, Qiwen
    NEURAL PLASTICITY, 2017, 2017