Applications of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Performance After Stroke: A Systematic Review

被引:11
|
作者
Safdar, Afifa [1 ]
Smith, Marie-Claire [2 ]
Byblow, Winston D. [2 ]
Stinear, Cathy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Auckland, Dept Med, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Dept Exercise Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
stroke; noninvasive brain stimulation; transcranial magnetic stimulation; theta burst stimulation; motor evoked potentials;
D O I
10.1177/15459683231209722
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is a promising technique for improving upper limb motor performance post-stroke. Its application has been guided by the interhemispheric competition model and typically involves suppression of contralesional motor cortex. However, the bimodal balance recovery model prompts a more tailored application of NIBS based on ipsilesional corticomotor function. Objective To review and assess the application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) protocols that aimed to improve upper limb motor performance after stroke. Methods A PubMed search was conducted for studies published between 1st January 2005 and 1st November 2022 using rTMS to improve upper limb motor performance of human adults after stroke. Studies were grouped according to whether facilitatory or suppressive rTMS was applied to the contralesional hemisphere. Results Of the 492 studies identified, 70 were included in this review. Only 2 studies did not conform to the interhemispheric competition model, and facilitated the contralesional hemisphere. Only 21 out of 70 (30%) studies reported motor evoked potential (MEP) status as a biomarker of ipsilesional corticomotor function. Around half of the studies (37/70, 53%) checked whether rTMS had the expected effect by measuring corticomotor excitability (CME) after application. Conclusion The interhemispheric competition model dominates the application of rTMS post-stroke. The majority of recent and current studies do not consider bimodal balance recovery model for the application of rTMS. Evaluating CME after the application rTMS could confirm that the intervention had the intended neurophysiological effect. Future studies could select patients and apply rTMS protocols based on ipsilesional MEP status.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 849
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in patients with stroke: a protocol of a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis
    Lu, Yue
    Xia, Yuan
    Wu, Yue
    Pan, Xinyong
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Li, Yongjie
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (03):
  • [22] Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review
    Fuentes Calderon, Maria Antonia
    Navarro Miralles, Ainhoa
    Jaramillo Pimienta, Mauricio
    Goncalves Estella, Jesus Maria
    Sanchez Ledesma, Maria Jose
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 43 (03)
  • [23] Analysis of the Factors Related to the Effectiveness of Transcranial Current Stimulation in Upper Limb Motor Function Recovery after Stroke: a Systematic Review
    María Antonia Fuentes Calderón
    Ainhoa Navarro Miralles
    Mauricio Jaramillo Pimienta
    Jesús María Gonçalves Estella
    María José Sánchez Ledesma
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2019, 43
  • [24] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Task Oriented Training to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Stroke
    Kim, Myoung-Kwon
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETICS, 2014, 19 (02) : 170 - 173
  • [25] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of lower limb motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Tung, Yi-Chun
    Lai, Chien-Hung
    Liao, Chun-De
    Huang, Shih-Wei
    Liou, Tsan-Hon
    Chen, Hung-Chou
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 33 (07) : 1102 - 1112
  • [26] Comparison of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Limb Recovery Among Patients With Recent Stroke
    Miu, Ka Ying Doris
    Kok, Ching
    Leung, Sau Shan
    Chan, Elaine Y. L.
    Wong, Elaine
    ANNALS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE-ARM, 2020, 44 (06): : 428 - 437
  • [27] Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation and Upper Limb Performance in Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Conforto, Adriana Bastos
    dos Anjos, Sarah Monteiro
    Bernardo, Wanderley Marques
    da Silva, Arnaldo Alves
    Conti, Juliana
    Machado, Andre G.
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2018, 32 (10) : 863 - 871
  • [28] Effects of corticospinal tract integrity on upper limb motor function recovery in stroke patients treated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Wang, Lu
    Zhu, Qi-Xiu
    Zhong, Ming-Hua
    Zhou, Rui-Zhi
    Liu, Xi-Qin
    Tang, Nai-Su
    Feng, Xiao-Chen
    Gao, Cheng-Fei
    JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 21 (02)
  • [29] Effects of Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with H-coil on Paretic Upper Limb Motor Function in Chronic Stroke
    Chieffo, Raffaella
    Scopelliti, Giuseppe
    Houdayer, Elise
    Di Maggio, Giovanni
    Ferrari, Laura
    Fichera, Mario
    Nuara, Arturo
    Simone, Guerrieri
    Santangelo, Roberto
    Zangen, Abraham
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Leocani, Letizia
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [30] The Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Weiwei
    Cao, Xiongbin
    Zhang, Xiaoyun
    Wang, Xuebing
    Li, Xiaowen
    Huai, Yaping
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15