A review on the handling of discounting in eco-efficiency analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Lueddeckens, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Business Management, Esp Sustainabil Management & Environm Accounting, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Eco-efficiency analysis; Eco-efficiency indicators; Eco-efficiency definitions; Discounting; Environmental discounting; ENVIRONMENTAL COST; LIFE-CYCLE; SUSTAINABILITY; GASIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; BUILDINGS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-022-02397-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decisions on measures reducing environmental damage or improving environmental impact are usually constrained by financial limitations. Eco-efficiency analysis has emerged as a practical decision support tool by integrating environmental and economic performance. Environmental impact, as well as economic revenues and expenses, are usually distributed over a certain time scale. The temporal distribution of economic data is frequently assessed by discounting while discounting of environmental impact is rather uncommon The scope of this paper is to reveal if this assumed inconsistency is common in eco-efficiency assessment literature, what reasons and interrelations with indicators exist and what solutions are proposed. Therefore, a systematic literature review is conducted and 35 publications are assessed. Theoretical eco-efficiency definitions and applied eco-efficiency indicators, as well as applied environmental and economic assessment methods, are compared here, but it is revealed that none of the empirical literature findings applied or discussed environmental discounting. It was, however, found in methodical literature. It is concluded that the theoretical foundation for the application of discounting on environmental impact is still insufficient and that even the theoretical foundation of economic discounting in studies is often poor. Further research and, eventually, a practical framework for environmental discounting would be beneficial for better-founded, more "eco-efficient" decisions. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 20
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Eco-Efficiency: A Romanian Perspective
    Sima, Violeta
    Gheorghe, Ileana Georgiana
    CREATING GLOBAL ECONOMIES THROUGH INNOVATION AND KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: THEORY & PRACTICE, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 1642 - 1650
  • [32] Eco-efficiency as abandonment of nature
    Hukkinen, J
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 38 (03) : 311 - 315
  • [33] Assessment of toxicological risks for eco-efficiency analysis.
    Saling, P
    Landsiedel, R
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 365 : R162 - R162
  • [34] Two decades of eco-efficiency research: a bibliometric analysis
    Izuchukwu John
    Ebenezer Miezah Kwofie
    Michael Ngadi
    Environmental Sustainability, 2020, 3 (2) : 155 - 168
  • [35] An analysis of the eco-efficiency and economic performance of Japanese companies
    Tatsuo, Kimbara
    ASIAN BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2010, 9 (02) : 209 - 222
  • [36] The effect of urbanization on agricultural eco-efficiency and mediation analysis
    Zhao, Xiaojing
    Yang, Jiamin
    Chen, Huijie
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Xi, Yanling
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2023, 11
  • [37] An analysis of the eco-efficiency and economic performance of Japanese companies
    Kimbara Tatsuo
    Asian Business & Management, 2010, 9 : 209 - 222
  • [38] Spatial Correlation and Convergence Analysis of Eco-Efficiency in China
    Zheng, Defeng
    Hao, Shuai
    Sun, Caizhi
    Lyu, Leting
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [39] Eco-Efficiency of Construction Materials: Data Envelopment Analysis
    Tatari, Omer
    Kucukvar, Murat
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 138 (06) : 733 - 741
  • [40] An eco-efficiency model for golf
    Bekken, Michael A. H.
    Mitchell, Paul D.
    Soldat, Douglas J.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166