A review on the handling of discounting in eco-efficiency analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Lueddeckens, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Chair Business Management, Esp Sustainabil Management & Environm Accounting, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Eco-efficiency analysis; Eco-efficiency indicators; Eco-efficiency definitions; Discounting; Environmental discounting; ENVIRONMENTAL COST; LIFE-CYCLE; SUSTAINABILITY; GASIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; BUILDINGS; FRAMEWORK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-022-02397-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Decisions on measures reducing environmental damage or improving environmental impact are usually constrained by financial limitations. Eco-efficiency analysis has emerged as a practical decision support tool by integrating environmental and economic performance. Environmental impact, as well as economic revenues and expenses, are usually distributed over a certain time scale. The temporal distribution of economic data is frequently assessed by discounting while discounting of environmental impact is rather uncommon The scope of this paper is to reveal if this assumed inconsistency is common in eco-efficiency assessment literature, what reasons and interrelations with indicators exist and what solutions are proposed. Therefore, a systematic literature review is conducted and 35 publications are assessed. Theoretical eco-efficiency definitions and applied eco-efficiency indicators, as well as applied environmental and economic assessment methods, are compared here, but it is revealed that none of the empirical literature findings applied or discussed environmental discounting. It was, however, found in methodical literature. It is concluded that the theoretical foundation for the application of discounting on environmental impact is still insufficient and that even the theoretical foundation of economic discounting in studies is often poor. Further research and, eventually, a practical framework for environmental discounting would be beneficial for better-founded, more "eco-efficient" decisions. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 20
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Eco-Efficiency Analysis For Chemical Process Design
    Ouattara, Adama
    Catherine, Azzaro-Pantel
    Luc, Pibouleau
    Serge, Domenech
    Philippe, Baudet
    Benjamin, Yao
    20TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2010, 28 : 1249 - 1254
  • [22] Analysis of eco-efficiency based on material flow
    Zhao J.-L.
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 2017, 20 (03) : 649 - 658
  • [23] Eco-efficiency analysis of textile coating materials
    S. M. Bidoki
    R. Wittlinger
    A. A. Alamdar
    J. Burger
    Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, 2006, 3 : 351 - 359
  • [24] Eco-efficiency analysis of biotech nological processes
    Saling, P
    APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 68 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [25] Eco-efficiency analysis: Applications and user contacts
    Gabriel, R
    Braune, A
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2005, 9 (04) : 19 - 21
  • [26] Formulation of guidelines for ICT eco-efficiency evaluation at the Japan forum on eco-efficiency
    Origuchi, Takeshi
    Sawada, Takashi
    Nishi, Shiro
    NTT Technical Review, 2007, 5 (03): : 18 - 24
  • [27] Eco-efficiency considering NetZero and data envelopment analysis: a critical literature review
    Emrouznejad, Ali
    Marra, Marianna
    Yang, Guo-Liang
    Michali, Maria
    IMA JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT MATHEMATICS, 2023, 34 (04) : 599 - 632
  • [28] The Research on Eco-design and Eco-efficiency of Life Cycle Analysis
    Wang, Lizhe
    Bai, Jianbo
    Wang, Hejin
    2019 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MATERIAL APPLICATION, 2020, 440
  • [29] Factory eco-efficiency modelling: framework application and analysis
    Dave, Aanand
    Salonitis, Konstantinos
    Ball, Peter
    Adams, Mark
    Morgan, David
    13TH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING - DECOUPLING GROWTH FROM RESOURCE USE, 2016, 40 : 214 - 219
  • [30] Measuring and Improving Eco-efficiency
    Chen, Jin-Xiao
    Chen, Jian
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (03) : 373 - 395