Assessing the Surface Modifications of Contaminated Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants Through Diode Lasers of Different Wavelengths: An In-Vitro Study

被引:6
|
作者
Darestani, Meshkat Naeimi [1 ]
Houshmand, Behzad [2 ]
Mosaddad, Seyed Ali [3 ,4 ]
Talebi, Mohammadreza [2 ]
机构
[1] Semnan Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Periodont, Semnan, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Periodont, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Dent, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Dent, Ghasr e Dasht St, Shiraz 7195615878, Iran
关键词
peri-implantitis; dental implants; X-ray diffraction; scanning electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; diode laser; Escherichia coli; TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; ER-YAG; MICROBIOLOGICAL FINDINGS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; ND-YAG; IRRADIATION; DECONTAMINATION; MUCOSITIS; ZIRCONIA;
D O I
10.1089/photob.2023.0009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study was conducted to compare the effects of 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual (810: 50%-980: 50%) diode lasers on the surface modifications of implants contaminated by a standard strain of Escherichia coli.Methods: Based on the operation on their surface, the implants were divided into six groups: "Group 1" was the positive control group undergoing no specific procedures. "Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6" were contaminated by a standard strain of E. coli; "Group 2" was also set as the negative control group. "Groups 3, 4, and 5" were irradiated by 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual lasers (810: 50%-980: 50%; 1.5W, 320 mu m fiber) for 30 sec, respectively. "Group 6" was treated using standard titanium brushes. All groups were examined to evaluate the surface modifications by the X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscopy.Results: The values of carbon, oxygen, aluminum, titanium, and vanadium were significantly different in the surface composition of the contaminated implants from the control groups (p = 0.010, 0.033, 0.044, 0.016, and 0.037, respectively). In all target areas, there were significant differences in surface roughness (p < 0.0001); the same was also true about the pairwise comparison of the study groups (p < 0.0001). "Group 5" demonstrated lower morphological surface changes and roughness degrees.Conclusions: Overall, laser irradiation could alter the surfaces of the contaminated implants. Titanium brushes and 810/980 nm lasers resulted in similar morphological alterations. Dual lasers enjoyed the least degree of morphological alterations and surface roughness.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 211
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Apatite-forming ability of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces modified by ultraviolet irradiation: An in vitro study
    Li, Shaobing
    Lin, Jiating
    Lin, Xi
    Liu, Xiangning
    Jia, Fang
    Gao, Yan
    Ni, Jia
    Xu, Shulan
    Shao, Longquan
    Cao, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2022, 45 (05): : 506 - 513
  • [32] The use of reduced healing times on ITI® implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface:: Early results from clinical trials on ITI® SLA implants
    Cochran, DL
    Buser, D
    ten Bruggenkate, CM
    Weingart, D
    Taylor, TM
    Bernard, JP
    Peters, F
    Simpson, JP
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2002, 13 (02) : 144 - 153
  • [33] 10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients
    Buser, Daniel
    Janner, Simone F. M.
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Braegger, Urs
    Ramseier, Christoph A.
    Salvi, Giovanni E.
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06) : 839 - 851
  • [34] Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 3-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients
    Bornstein, MM
    Lussi, A
    Schmid, B
    Belser, UC
    Buser, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (05) : 659 - 666
  • [35] Evaluation of Implant Stability Quotient of Sandblasted Acid-Etched (SAE) and Chemical-Modified SAE Dental Implants: A Clinical Study
    Satpathy, Soumyadev
    Varalakshmi, Udutha
    Tenglikar, Pavan
    Chowdary, Koduru Ranga Roy
    Khader, Anas Abdul
    Parihar, Anuj Singh
    Kumar, Yashavanth D. S.
    Samanta, Anupa
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S2075 - S2077
  • [36] Bone Formation Around One-Stage Implants with a Modified Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: Human Histologic Results at 4 Weeks
    Degidi, Marco
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Shibli, Jamil A.
    Perrotti, Vittoria
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2009, 29 (06) : 607 - 613
  • [37] Assessment of the Effect of Chemical Agents Used in Dentistry on the Removal of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli from Sandblasted Acid-Etched Titanium Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Ferreira, Cimara Fortes
    Babu, Jegdish
    Tipton, David
    Hottel, Timothy Lee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (02) : 299 - 307
  • [38] Assessment of the Effect of CO2 Laser Irradiation on the Reduction of Bacteria Seeded on Commercially Available Sandblasted Acid-Etched Titanium Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Ferreira, Cimara Fortes
    Babu, Jegdish
    Migliorati, Erica Krohn Jany
    Stein, Sydney
    Garcia-Godoy, Franklin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2015, 30 (03) : 588 - 595
  • [39] Effect of Dehiscences to the Bone Response of Implants With an Acid-Etched Surface: An Experimental Study in Miniature Pigs
    Ruehe, Baerbel
    Heberer, Susanne
    Bayreuther, Katja
    Nelson, Katja
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (01) : 3 - 18
  • [40] Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles
    Bornstein, Michael M.
    Valderrama, Pilar
    Jones, Archie A.
    Wilson, Thomas G.
    Seibl, Reinhart
    Cochran, David L.
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (03) : 233 - 241