Assessing the Surface Modifications of Contaminated Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Implants Through Diode Lasers of Different Wavelengths: An In-Vitro Study

被引:6
|
作者
Darestani, Meshkat Naeimi [1 ]
Houshmand, Behzad [2 ]
Mosaddad, Seyed Ali [3 ,4 ]
Talebi, Mohammadreza [2 ]
机构
[1] Semnan Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Periodont, Semnan, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Periodont, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Dent, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Dent, Ghasr e Dasht St, Shiraz 7195615878, Iran
关键词
peri-implantitis; dental implants; X-ray diffraction; scanning electron microscopy; atomic force microscopy; diode laser; Escherichia coli; TITANIUM DENTAL IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; ER-YAG; MICROBIOLOGICAL FINDINGS; BACTERIAL ADHESION; ND-YAG; IRRADIATION; DECONTAMINATION; MUCOSITIS; ZIRCONIA;
D O I
10.1089/photob.2023.0009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study was conducted to compare the effects of 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual (810: 50%-980: 50%) diode lasers on the surface modifications of implants contaminated by a standard strain of Escherichia coli.Methods: Based on the operation on their surface, the implants were divided into six groups: "Group 1" was the positive control group undergoing no specific procedures. "Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6" were contaminated by a standard strain of E. coli; "Group 2" was also set as the negative control group. "Groups 3, 4, and 5" were irradiated by 810 nm, 980 nm, and dual lasers (810: 50%-980: 50%; 1.5W, 320 mu m fiber) for 30 sec, respectively. "Group 6" was treated using standard titanium brushes. All groups were examined to evaluate the surface modifications by the X-ray diffraction analysis, scanning electron microscope, and atomic force microscopy.Results: The values of carbon, oxygen, aluminum, titanium, and vanadium were significantly different in the surface composition of the contaminated implants from the control groups (p = 0.010, 0.033, 0.044, 0.016, and 0.037, respectively). In all target areas, there were significant differences in surface roughness (p < 0.0001); the same was also true about the pairwise comparison of the study groups (p < 0.0001). "Group 5" demonstrated lower morphological surface changes and roughness degrees.Conclusions: Overall, laser irradiation could alter the surfaces of the contaminated implants. Titanium brushes and 810/980 nm lasers resulted in similar morphological alterations. Dual lasers enjoyed the least degree of morphological alterations and surface roughness.
引用
收藏
页码:201 / 211
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Alterations in Surface Roughness and Chemical Characteristics of Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Titanium Implants after Irradiation with Different Diode Lasers
    Kim, Hak-Ki
    Park, Su-Yeon
    Son, Keunbada
    Kim, Yong-Gun
    Yu, Won-Jae
    Lee, Kyu-Bok
    Lee, Jae-Mok
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [2] Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants
    Li, DH
    Ferguson, SJ
    Beutler, T
    Cochran, DL
    Sittig, C
    Hirt, HP
    Buser, D
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 60 (02): : 325 - 332
  • [3] Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: A histologic study in rats
    Marinho, VC
    Celletti, R
    Bracchetti, G
    Petrone, G
    Minkin, C
    Piattelli, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (01) : 75 - 81
  • [4] Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants
    Orsini, G
    Assenza, B
    Scarano, A
    Piattelli, M
    Piattelli, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2000, 15 (06) : 779 - 784
  • [5] Surface analysis of machined and sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) titanium implants
    Piattelli, M
    Iezzi, G
    Orsini, G
    Petrone, G
    Piattelli, M
    Scarano, A
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1245 - 1245
  • [6] Efficacy of plasma treatment for surface cleansing and osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants
    Bae, Gang-Ho
    Cho, Won-Tak
    Lee, Jong-Ho
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 16 (03): : 189 - 199
  • [7] Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface
    Barewal, RM
    Oates, TW
    Meredith, N
    Cochran, DL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (05) : 641 - 651
  • [8] Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface
    Bornstein, MM
    Schmid, B
    Belser, UC
    Lussi, A
    Buser, D
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2005, 16 (06) : 631 - 638
  • [9] Surface characteristics and biocompatibility of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface modified by ultraviolet irradiation: An in vitro study
    Li, Shaobing
    Ni, Jia
    Liu, Xiangning
    Zhang, Xueyang
    Yin, Shiheng
    Rong, Mingdeng
    Guo, Zehong
    Zhou, Lei
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2012, 100B (06) : 1587 - 1598
  • [10] Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible
    Cochran, DL
    Schenk, RK
    Lussi, A
    Higginbottom, FL
    Buser, D
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1998, 40 (01): : 1 - 11