Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Anouti, Ahmad [1 ]
Patel, Madhukar S. [2 ]
Vanwagner, Lisa B. [1 ]
Lee, William M. [1 ]
Asrani, Sumeet K. [3 ]
Mufti, Arjmand R. [1 ]
Rich, Nicole E. [1 ]
Vagefi, Parsia A. [2 ]
Shah, Jigesh A. [2 ]
Kerr, Thomas A. [1 ]
Pedersen, Mark [1 ]
Hanish, Steven [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [1 ]
Cotter, Thomas G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[4] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
DISEASE SCORE; ADULT; AGE; IMPACT; LOBE; MODEL; RECIPIENTS; SAFETY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1097/LVT.0000000000000228
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (=25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in living donor liver transplantation
    Akyildiz, M
    Karasu, Z
    Arikan, C
    Kilic, M
    Zeytunlu, M
    Gunsar, F
    Ersoz, G
    Akarca, U
    Batur, Y
    Tokat, Y
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (05) : 1442 - 1444
  • [42] Meld score predicts outcome after living donor liver transplantation.
    van Ijperen, M
    Brandhagen, DJ
    Balan, V
    Rosen, CB
    Mulligan, D
    Poterucha, J
    Douglas, D
    Kremers, W
    Wiesner, R
    HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 36 (04) : 670A - 670A
  • [43] Utilization of and Outcomes Following Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Recipients with High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score in the United States
    Kumar, S.
    Lin, S.
    Schold, J. D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S722 - S722
  • [44] Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients According to the MELD Score
    Lee, J. G.
    Kim, D. G.
    Lee, J. J.
    Kim, S. H.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Kwon, S. -K.
    Joo, D. J.
    Ju, M. K.
    Choi, G. H.
    Choi, J. S.
    Kim, S. I.
    Kim, M. S.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (05) : 218 - 219
  • [45] Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients According to the MELD Score
    Lee, Jae Geun
    Lee, Juhan
    Lee, Jung Jun
    Song, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Jee Youn
    Kim, Su-kyung
    Joo, Dong Jin
    Ju, Man Ki
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Choi, Jin Sub
    Kim, Soon Il
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 : S240 - S240
  • [46] Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Liver Trnasplant Recipients According To the MELD Score
    Lee, Juhan
    Lee, Jae Geun
    Joo, Dong Jin
    Han, Dae Hoon
    Ju, Man Ki
    Choi, Jin Sub
    Kim, Soon Il
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 99 : 94 - 94
  • [47] Assessment of the global practice of living donor liver transplantation
    Emamaullee, Juliet
    Conrad, Claire
    Kim, Michelle
    Goldbeck, Cameron
    Kwon, Yong
    Singh, Pranay
    Niemann, Claus U.
    Sher, Linda
    Genyk, Yuri
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 (10) : 1914 - 1927
  • [48] Outcomes of living and deceased donor liver transplant recipients according to the MELD score
    Lee, Jae Geun
    Lee, Juhan
    Lee, Jung Jun
    Song, Seung Hwan
    Lee, Jee Youn
    Kwon, Su-Kyung
    Joo, Dong Jin
    Ju, Man Ki
    Choi, Gi Hong
    Choi, Jin Sub
    Kim, Soon Il
    Kim, Myoung Soo
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 100 (07) : S511 - S512
  • [49] Outcomes of Living and Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Recipients According to the MELD Score
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    Joo, D.
    Han, D.
    Ju, M.
    Choi, J.
    Kim, S.
    Kim, M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15
  • [50] OUTCOMES OF LIVING AND DECEASED DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS ACCORDING TO THE MELD SCORE
    Lee, Juhan
    Jae, Geun Lee
    Seung, Hwan Song
    Dong, Jin Joo
    Dae, Hoon Han
    Man, Ki Ju
    Jin, Sub Choi
    Kim, Soon Il
    Myoung, Soo Kim
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 28 : 107 - 107