Increasing practice and acceptable outcomes of high-MELD living donor liver transplantation in the USA

被引:1
|
作者
Anouti, Ahmad [1 ]
Patel, Madhukar S. [2 ]
Vanwagner, Lisa B. [1 ]
Lee, William M. [1 ]
Asrani, Sumeet K. [3 ]
Mufti, Arjmand R. [1 ]
Rich, Nicole E. [1 ]
Vagefi, Parsia A. [2 ]
Shah, Jigesh A. [2 ]
Kerr, Thomas A. [1 ]
Pedersen, Mark [1 ]
Hanish, Steven [2 ]
Singal, Amit G. [1 ]
Cotter, Thomas G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Digest & Liver Dis, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[4] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
DISEASE SCORE; ADULT; AGE; IMPACT; LOBE; MODEL; RECIPIENTS; SAFETY; GRAFT;
D O I
10.1097/LVT.0000000000000228
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent deceased-donor allocation changes in the United States may have increased high-Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) living donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, outcomes in these patients remain poorly defined. We aimed to examine the impact of the MELD score on LDLT outcomes. Using UNOS data (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2021), LDLT recipients were identified and stratified into low-MELD (<15), intermediate-MELD (15-24), and high-MELD (=25) groups. We compared outcomes between MELD-stratified LDLT groups and between MELD-stratified LDLT and donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis to compare graft survival rates and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling to identify factors associated with graft outcomes. Of 3558 LDLTs, 1605 (45.1%) were low-MELD, 1616 (45.4%) intermediate-MELD, and 337 (9.5%) high-MELD. Over the study period, the annual number of LDLTs increased from 282 to 569, and the proportion of high-MELD LDLTs increased from 3.9% to 7.7%. Graft survival was significantly higher in low-MELD versus high-MELD LDLT recipients (adjusted HR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.03-1.79); however, 5-year survival exceeded 70.0% in both groups. We observed no significant difference in graft survival between high-MELD LDLT and high-MELD donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients (adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI:0.99-1.58), with a 5-year survival of 71.5% and 77.3%, respectively. Low LDLT center volume (<3 LDLTs/year) and recipient life support requirement were both associated with inferior graft outcomes among high-MELD LDLT recipients. While higher MELD scores confer graft failure risk in LDLT, high-MELD LDLT outcomes are acceptable with similar outcomes to MELD-stratified donation after brain death liver transplantation recipients. Future practice guidance should consider the expansion of LDLT recommendations to high-MELD recipients in centers with expertise to help reduce donor shortage.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 82
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Live Donor Liver Transplantation in High MELD Score Recipients
    Selzner, Markus
    Kashfi, Arash
    Cattral, Mark S.
    Selzner, Nazia
    McGilvray, Ian D.
    Greig, Paul D.
    Levy, Gary A.
    Renner, Eberhard L.
    Grant, David R.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2010, 251 (01) : 153 - 157
  • [32] Outcomes of Partial Liver Transplantation in the MELD Era: Deceased Donor Split vs Live Donor Liver Transplantation.
    Saidi, R. F.
    Li, Y.
    Shah, S.
    Bozorgzadeh, A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 : 338 - 339
  • [33] High MELD score does not affect outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients
    Saraf, Neeraj
    Yadav, Sanjay K.
    Choudhary, Narendra S.
    Saigal, Sanjiv
    Bhangui, Prashant
    Goja, Sanjay
    Rastogi, Amit
    Soin, Arvinder
    HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : 496A - 496A
  • [34] Adult living donor liver transplantation: Donor characteristics and outcomes
    Mayes, T
    Mantry, P
    Sundaram, U
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 124 (04) : A661 - A661
  • [35] Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Sick Patients with MELD Score ≥ 35.
    Soong, R. -S.
    Wang, Y. -C.
    Cheng, C. -H.
    Wu, T. -H.
    Lee, C. -F.
    Wu, T. -J.
    Chou, H. -S.
    Chan, K. -M.
    Lee, C. -S.
    Lee, W. -C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 471 - 471
  • [36] MELD Score Does Not Predict Outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation.
    Tomiyama, K.
    Kaido, T.
    Ogura, Y.
    Hata, K.
    Yoshizawa, A.
    Uemoto, S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 : 508 - 508
  • [37] Donor outcomes following living donor liver transplantation.
    Renz, JF
    Reichert, PR
    Rosenthal, P
    Roberts, JP
    Stock, PG
    Ascher, NL
    Emond, JC
    HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) : 441 - 441
  • [38] Enhanced recovery after surgery in high-MELD patients undergoing liver transplantation: a single center evaluation
    Chan, S.
    Tan, Y. W.
    Bui, C. Myo
    Grogan, T.
    Sheth, M.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 30 : 107 - 107
  • [39] OUTCOMES OF LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS IN PATIENTS WITH MELD SCORES LESS THAN 15
    Mekeel, Kristin L.
    Moss, Adyr
    Reddy, Kunam S.
    Douglas, David D.
    Vargas, Hugo E.
    Carey, Elizabeth J.
    Byrne, Thomas
    Aqel, Bashar
    Harrison, M. Edwyn
    Mulligan, David C.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 48 (04) : 593A - 594A
  • [40] Increasing Living Donor Liver Transplantation Using Liver Paired Exchange
    Gunabushanam, Vikraman
    Ganesh, Swaytha
    Soltys, Kyle
    Mazariegos, George
    Ganoza, Armando
    Molinari, Michele
    Tevar, Amit
    Hughes, Christopher
    Humar, Abhinav
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2022, 234 (02) : 115 - 120