The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Xiao-Lu [1 ]
Ouyang, Kui [1 ]
Yang, Rui [2 ]
Sun, Jia-Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Feng [2 ]
Zhao, Hong-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Med Coll, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weifang Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Affiliated Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, 20 East Yuhuangding Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01377-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP).Material and methods From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.Results The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 +/- 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 +/- 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.Conclusion CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy
    Antiphon, P
    Hoznek, A
    Gettman, M
    De La Taille, A
    Salomon, L
    Katz, R
    Borkowski, T
    Abbou, CC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 249 - 249
  • [42] Comparative study of extraperitoneal singe-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and transperitoneal multiport robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using propensity score matching
    Yoon, Ji Hyung
    Kwon, Taekmin
    Kim, Seong Cheol
    Park, Sungchan
    Cheon, Sang Hyeon
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2024, 13 (06) : 1004 - 1013
  • [43] ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RARP)-ANASTOMOSIS TECHNIQUE WITHOUT POSTOPERATIVE URETHRAL CATHETER
    Schiefelbein, Frank
    Harke, Nina
    Noe, Michael
    Schoen, Georg
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E143 - E143
  • [44] Necessity of indwelling drainage catheter after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Nohara, Takahiro
    Kato, Yuki
    Nakagawa, Tomomi
    Nakashima, Kazufumi
    Iijima, Masashi
    Kawaguchi, Shohei
    Shigehara, Kazuyoshi
    Izumi, Kouji
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Mizokami, Atsushi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 25 : 334 - 334
  • [45] Extraperitoneal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Short-term outcomes and technique description
    Kwon, Hyeok Jae
    Kang, San
    Rhew, Seung Ah
    Yoon, Chang Eil
    Shin, Dongho
    Bang, Seokhwan
    Moon, Hyong Woo
    Bae, Woong Jin
    Cho, Hyuk Jin
    Ha, U-Syn
    Lee, Ji Youl
    Kim, Sae Woong
    Hong, Sung-Hoo
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2024, 65 (05) : 442 - 450
  • [46] Technique of da Vinci robot-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy
    Tewari, A
    Peabody, J
    Sarle, R
    Balakrishnan, G
    Hemal, A
    Shrivastava, A
    Menon, M
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (04) : 569 - 572
  • [47] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Operative technique - step by step
    Ozveren, Bora
    Turkeri, Levent
    UROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 92 - 96
  • [48] Complications Associated With Extraperitoneal Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Standardized Martin Classification
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    Scosyrev, Emelian
    Patel, Hitendra
    Messing, Edward M.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (02) : 324 - 331
  • [49] Switching from Endoscopic Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: Comparing Outcomes and Complications
    Wagenhoffer, Robert
    Gruner, Maren
    Schymik, Jan
    Schachtner, Lydia
    Neagoe, Liviu
    Berg, Christine
    Schlichter, Andreas
    Manseck, Andreas
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (04) : 380 - 385
  • [50] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a high-volume surgical center experience
    Scarcia, Marcello
    Zazzara, Michele
    Divenuto, Lucia
    Cardo, Giuseppe
    Portoghese, Filippo
    Romano, Michele
    Ludovico, Giuseppe M.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2018, 70 (05) : 479 - 485