The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Xiao-Lu [1 ]
Ouyang, Kui [1 ]
Yang, Rui [2 ]
Sun, Jia-Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Feng [2 ]
Zhao, Hong-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Med Coll, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weifang Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Affiliated Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, 20 East Yuhuangding Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01377-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP).Material and methods From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.Results The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 +/- 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 +/- 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.Conclusion CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized comparison of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal access for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Capello, Seth A.
    Boczko, Judd
    Patel, Hitendra R. H.
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (10) : 1199 - 1202
  • [22] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in patients with prior hernia surgery
    Boczko, J.
    Capello, S.
    Mathe, M.
    Erturk, E.
    Patel, H.
    Joseph, J. V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A216 - A216
  • [23] Karolinska prostatectomy: A robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique
    Nilsson, Andreas E.
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Laven, Brett A.
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2006, 40 (06): : 453 - 458
  • [25] A prospective comparison between extraperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Boczko, J.
    Capello, S.
    Mathe, M.
    Erturk, E.
    Patel, H.
    Joseph, J. V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A45 - A45
  • [26] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A review of the current literature
    Xylinas, Evanguelos
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Durand, Xavier
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 31 (03) : 288 - 293
  • [28] ROBOT-ASSISTED SIMPLE PROSTATECTOMY: ILLUSTRATION OF A SIMPLIFIED EXTRAPERITONEAL, TRANSCAPSULAR TECHNIQUE
    Gurung, Pratik
    Mithal, Prabhakar
    Lu, Diane
    Ghazi, Ahmed
    Joseph, Jean
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E166 - E167
  • [29] Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy by an Extraperitoneal Approach
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    Kyriazis, Iason
    Kotsiris, Dimitrios
    Ntasiotis, Panteleimon
    Liatsikos, Evangelos N.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2018, 32 : S39 - S43
  • [30] A continuing debate: Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Which is the better technique?
    Boczko, J
    Golijanin, D
    Icente, IV
    Erturk, E
    Patel, HR
    Joseph, JV
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04): : 106 - 106