The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Jiang, Xiao-Lu [1 ]
Ouyang, Kui [1 ]
Yang, Rui [2 ]
Sun, Jia-Ning [2 ]
Zhang, Feng [2 ]
Zhao, Hong-Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ, Med Coll, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Weifang Med Univ, Sch Clin Med, Affiliated Hosp, Weifang, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, 20 East Yuhuangding Rd, Yantai 264000, Shandong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Robotic surgery; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Extraperitoneal; CONTINENCE RECOVERY; METAANALYSIS; TRANSPERITONEAL; COMPLICATIONS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-023-01377-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To describe a technique to improve exposure of prostate during extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (EP-RARP).Material and methods From March 2020 to June 2022, a total of 41 patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery underwent EP-RARP. Twenty-three patients improved exposure by traction of prostate through urinary catheter. The catheter traction prostatectomy (CTP) group was compared with the standard prostatectomy (SP) group using three robotic arms (18 patients) in terms of estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, positive surgical margin rate, the recovery rate of urinary continence, Gleason score and postoperative hospital stays. Differences were considered significant when P < 0.05.Results The operative time was lower in the CTP group (109.63 min vs. 143.20 min; P < 0.001). EBL in the CTP group was 178.26 +/- 30.70 mL, and in the standard prostatectomy group, it was 347.78 +/- 53.53 mL (P < 0.001). No significant differences with regard to postoperative hospital stay, recovery rate of urinary continence, catheterization time and positive surgical margin were observed between both groups. No intraoperative complications occurred in all the patients. After 6 months of follow-up, the Post-op Detectable prostate specific antigen was similar between the two groups.Conclusion CTP is a feasible, safe, and valid procedure in EP-RARP. Application of CTP improved the exposure of prostate, reduced operative time and blood loss in comparison with the conventional procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The application of Foley catheter traction technique in extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Xiao-Lu Jiang
    Kui OuYang
    Rui Yang
    Jia-Ning Sun
    Feng Zhang
    Hong-Wei Zhao
    BMC Urology, 23
  • [2] Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Indications, Technique and Outcomes
    Semerjian, Alice
    Pavlovich, Christian P.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2017, 18 (06)
  • [3] Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Indications, Technique and Outcomes
    Alice Semerjian
    Christian P. Pavlovich
    Current Urology Reports, 2017, 18
  • [4] Novel technique to enhance bladder neck dissection with traction of Foley catheter during extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Lin, Henry Y.
    Chen, Yu-Chi
    Lin, Victor C.
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [6] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: urinary continence and complications
    Patel, HRH
    Rosenbaum, R
    Madeb, R
    Vicente, I
    Joseph, JV
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 95 : 83 - 83
  • [7] Is there a proper pelvic size for an extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Boczko, Judd
    Erturk, Erdal
    Joseph, Jean V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 (11) : 1353 - 1356
  • [8] Robot-assisted extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy in a patient with a pelvic kidney
    Boczko, Judd
    Joseph, Jean V.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (05) : 1122.e3 - 1122.e4
  • [9] Pneumothorax: A rare complication of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Shimizu, Yousuke
    Kanamaru, Sojun
    Ito, Noriyuki
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 22 (12) : 1171 - 1172
  • [10] Extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and concomitant inguinal herniorrhaphy
    Boczko, J.
    Capello, S.
    Golijanin, D.
    Madeb, R.
    Erturk, E.
    Patel, H.
    Joseph, J. V.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2006, 20 : A221 - A221