Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Contrast-Enhanced Breast Imaging
    Maidment, A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [32] Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI of the Breast: How Is It Used?
    Kataoka, Masako
    Honda, Maya
    Ohashi, Akane
    Yamaguchi, Ken
    Mori, Naoko
    Goto, Mariko
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kato, Yutaka
    Satake, Hiroko
    Iima, Mami
    Kubota, Kazunori
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 21 (01) : 83 - 94
  • [33] Comparison between Breast MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography
    Luczynska, Elzbieta
    Heinze-Paluchowska, Sylwia
    Hendrick, Edward
    Dyczek, Sonia
    Rys, Janusz
    Herman, Krzysztof
    Blecharz, Pawel
    Jakubowicz, Jerzy
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2015, 21 : 1358 - 1367
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity
    C. W. Piccoli
    European Radiology, 1997, 7 : S281 - S288
  • [35] Value of contrast-enhanced MRI of breast after silicone implant
    Heinig, A
    HeywangKobrunner, SH
    Viehweg, P
    Lampe, D
    Buchmann, J
    Spielmann, RP
    RADIOLOGE, 1997, 37 (09): : 710 - 717
  • [36] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer
    Turnbull, Lindsay W.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2009, 22 (01) : 28 - 39
  • [37] Value of contrast-enhanced MRI of breast after silicone implant
    A. Heinig
    S. H. Heywang-Köbrunner
    P. Viehweg
    D. Lampe
    J. Buchmann
    R. P. Spielmann
    Der Radiologe, 1997, 37 : 710 - 717
  • [38] Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment Comparison of contrast-enhanced
    Huang, Hailiang
    Scaduto, David A.
    Liu, Chunling
    Yang, Jie
    Zhu, Chencan
    Rinaldi, Kim
    Eisenberg, Jason
    Liu, Jingxuan
    Hoernig, Mathias
    Wicklein, Julia
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Mertelmeier, Thomas
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Zhao, Wei
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2019, 6 (03)
  • [39] Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Screening Multifocal and Multicentric Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients
    Feng, Lei
    Sheng, Lei
    Zhang, Litao
    Li, Na
    Xie, Yuanzhong
    CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 2022
  • [40] Contrast-enhanced breast MRI: factors affecting sensitivity and specificity
    Piccoli, CW
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (Suppl 5) : S281 - S288