Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative evaluation of contrast agent uptake in standard fat-suppressed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations of the breast
    Kousi, Evanthia
    Smith, Joely
    Ledger, Araminta E.
    Scurr, Erica
    Allen, Steven
    Wilson, Robin M.
    O'Flynn, Elizabeth
    Pope, Romney J. E.
    Leach, Martin O.
    Schmidt, Maria A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (01) : 287 - 296
  • [22] Can contrast-enhanced mammography replace dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of sonomammographic indeterminate breast lesions?
    Rasha Mohamed Kamal
    Mennatallah Mohamed Hanafy
    Sahar Mahmoud Mansour
    Maher Hassan
    Mohamed Mohamed Gomaa
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 51
  • [23] A head-to-head comparison of breast lesion's conspicuity at contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Santonocito, Ambra
    Zarcaro, Calogero
    Zeitouni, Layla
    Ferrara, Francesca
    Kapetas, Panagiotis
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Clauser, Paola
    Baltzer, Pascal A. T.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [24] Can contrast-enhanced mammography replace dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the assessment of sonomammographic indeterminate breast lesions?
    Kamal, Rasha Mohamed
    Hanafy, Mennatallah Mohamed
    Mansour, Sahar Mahmoud
    Hassan, Maher
    Gomaa, Mohamed Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01):
  • [25] Artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pictorial essay
    David T. Fetzer
    Vasileios Rafailidis
    Cynthia Peterson
    Edward G. Grant
    Paul Sidhu
    Richard G. Barr
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 977 - 997
  • [26] Artifacts in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pictorial essay
    Fetzer, David T.
    Rafailidis, Vasileios
    Peterson, Cynthia
    Grant, Edward G.
    Sidhu, Paul
    Barr, Richard G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (04) : 977 - 997
  • [27] Artifacts and Pitfalls in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver
    Dietrich, C. F.
    Ignee, A.
    Greis, C.
    Cui, X. W.
    Schreiber-Dietrich, D. G.
    Hocke, M.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2014, 35 (02): : 108 - 128
  • [28] Artifacts and Technical Considerations at Contrast-enhanced US
    Fetzer, David T.
    Vijay, Kanupriya
    Caserta, Melanie P.
    Patterson-Lachowicz, Amber
    Dahiya, Nirvikar
    Rodgers, Shuchi K.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2023, 43 (02)
  • [29] Impact of contrast agent injection duration on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification in prostate cancer
    Klawer, Edzo M. E.
    van Houdt, Petra J.
    Pos, Floris J.
    Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J.
    van Osch, Matthias J. P.
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 31 (09)
  • [30] Comparison of Gadolinium Contrast Agent Retention in Patients Receiving Multiple Contrast-enhanced MRI Exams
    Fisher, Ryan
    Jain, Vikas
    Glaab, Jonathan
    McMillan, Aubrey
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 2: BIOIMAGING, 2020, : 109 - 115