Smart forecasting of artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI before contrast agent administration

被引:3
|
作者
Liebert, Andrzej [1 ]
Das, Badhan K. [1 ]
Kapsner, Lorenz A. [1 ,2 ]
Eberle, Jessica [1 ]
Skwierawska, Dominika [1 ]
Folle, Lukas [3 ]
Schreiter, Hannes [1 ]
Laun, Frederik B. [1 ]
Ohlmeyer, Sabine [1 ]
Uder, Michael [1 ]
Wenkel, Evelyn [4 ,5 ]
Bickelhaupt, Sebastian [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Inst Radiol, Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Klinikum Erlangen, Med Ctr Informat & Commun Technol, Erlangen, Germany
[3] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Pattern Recognit Lab, Erlangen, Germany
[4] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg FAU, Med Fak, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Radiol Munchen, Munich, Germany
[6] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Breast; Forecasting; Artifact; Neural networks (computer); CANCER; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-023-10469-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate whether artifacts on contrast-enhanced (CE) breast MRI maximum intensity projections (MIPs) might already be forecast before gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administration during an ongoing examination by analyzing the unenhanced T1-weighted images acquired before the GBCA injection.Materials and methodsThis IRB-approved retrospective analysis consisted of n = 2884 breast CE MRI examinations after intravenous administration of GBCA, acquired with n = 4 different MRI devices at different field strengths (1.5 T/3 T) during clinical routine. CE-derived subtraction MIPs were used to conduct a multi-class multi-reader evaluation of the presence and severity of artifacts with three independent readers. An ensemble classifier (EC) of five DenseNet models was used to predict artifacts for the post-contrast subtraction MIPs, giving as the input source only the pre-contrast T1-weighted sequence. Thus, the acquisition directly preceded the GBCA injection. The area under ROC (AuROC) and diagnostics accuracy scores were used to assess the performance of the neural network in an independent holdout test set (n = 285).ResultsAfter majority voting, potentially significant artifacts were detected in 53.6% (n = 1521) of all breast MRI examinations (age 49.6 +/- 12.6 years). In the holdout test set (mean age 49.7 +/- 11.8 years), at a specificity level of 89%, the EC could forecast around one-third of artifacts (sensitivity 31%) before GBCA administration, with an AuROC = 0.66.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the capability of a neural network to forecast the occurrence of artifacts on CE subtraction data before the GBCA administration. If confirmed in larger studies, this might enable a workflow-blended approach to prevent breast MRI artifacts by implementing in-scan personalized predictive algorithms.Clinical relevance statementSome artifacts in contrast-enhanced breast MRI maximum intensity projections might be predictable before gadolinium-based contrast agent injection using a neural network.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts.center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.Key Points center dot Potentially significant artifacts can be observed in a relevant proportion of breast MRI subtraction sequences after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration (GBCA).center dot Forecasting the occurrence of such artifacts in subtraction maximum intensity projections before GBCA administration for individual patients was feasible at 89% specificity, which allowed correctly predicting one in three future artifacts. center dot Further research is necessary to investigate the clinical value of such smart personalized imaging approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:4752 / 4763
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Carotid Atherosclerosis: Dependence on Contrast Agent
    Kerwin, William S.
    Zhao, Xihai
    Yuan, Chun
    Hatsukami, Thomas S.
    Maravilla, Kenneth R.
    Underhill, Hunter R.
    Zhao, Xueqiao
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [2] Breast Cancer Supplemental Screening: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography or Contrast-Enhanced MRI?
    Rashidi, Ali
    Lowry, Kathryn P.
    Sadigh, Gelareh
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (04)
  • [3] Implementing the advantages of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced breast MRI in breast cancer staging
    Fallenberg, Eva M.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2025, 35 (01) : 160 - 162
  • [4] Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis-Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    Lewin, John M.
    Chiang, Chia-Ling
    Hung, Bao-Hui
    Yang, Tsung-Lung
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Liao, Jia-Bin
    Pan, Huay-Ben
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (12) : 2501 - 2508
  • [5] Cylindrical Inversion Pulse for the Reduction of Cardiac Motion Artifacts in Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI
    Yoneyama, Masami
    Nakamura, Masanobu
    Ozawa, Yuriko
    Obara, Makoto
    Okuaki, Tomoyuki
    Tatsuno, Satoshi
    Sashi, Ryuji
    Sawano, Seishi
    Van Cauteren, Marc
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 17 (01) : 80 - 85
  • [6] Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Moy, Linda
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 50 (02) : 377 - 390
  • [7] BIRADS 4 breast lesions: comparison of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI
    Yasin R.
    El Ghany E.A.
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 50 (1):
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series
    Huang, Pi-Yi
    Tsai, Meng-Yuan
    Huang, Jer-Shyung
    Lin, Pei-Ying
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2023, 50 (04) : 521 - 529
  • [9] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series
    Pi-Yi Huang
    Meng-Yuan Tsai
    Jer-Shyung Huang
    Pei-Ying Lin
    Chen-Pin Chou
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2023, 50 : 521 - 529
  • [10] Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Hittmair, K.
    Gomiscek, G.
    Langenberger, K.
    Recht, M.
    Imhof, H.
    Kramer, J.
    1600, John Wiley and Sons Inc (31):