Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge for methane production: Evaluation of optimum ratio, microbial analysis, and kinetic modeling

被引:2
|
作者
Jhunjhunwala, Uday [1 ]
Padhi, Susant Kumar [1 ]
Pattanaik, Lopa [2 ]
Sharma, Dhruv [1 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
Chaudhary, Pallavi [1 ]
Saxena, Vikalp [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiv Nadar Inst Eminence Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Greater Noida 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] NIIT Univ, Dept Biotechnol & Bioinformat, Neemrana 301705, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Food waste; Waste activated sludge; Optimum ratio; Methane; Kinetic model; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ORGANIC WASTES; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PRETREATMENT; BIOMASS; STRAW; ENHANCEMENT; HYDROLYSIS; STABILITY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-023-04339-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and waste activated sludge (WAS) in batch reactors (R1-R4) to determine the optimum ratio using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. A food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio of similar to 2 was maintained in each reactor, and the result indicated that FW to WAS ratio of 50:50% in R1 was optimum, with the highest cumulative methane production of 5916 mL observed over 32 days. The cumulative methane production follows the order of R1 > R2 > R3 > R4, which is correlated with the reduction of volatile solid (VS) and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD). The digestate sludge from R1 after methane production shows its potential for use as a biofertilizer based on the acceptable C/N ratio (13.25). In addition, the liquid digestate generated is rich in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, making this a valuable source of liquid fertilizer. Microbial community analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing in R1 showed the dominance of Firmicutes at the phylum level and Lactobacillus at the genus level in anaerobic co-digestion. The cumulative methane production in various reactors was validated using different kinetic models based on co-efficient of determination (R-2). The Logistic Function model gives a best fit for R1 (R-2 = 0.9915 and methane potential = 5964 mL), whereas the Fitzhugh model gives a good agreement for R2 (R-2 = 0.9885 and methane potential = 3280 mL), R3 (R-2 = 0.9812 and methane potential = 1442 mL), and R4 (R-2 = 0.9721 and methane potential = 1177 mL). The finding of this study would help to scale-up the co-digestion of FW and WAS at an optimum ratio for methane production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge
    Heo, NH
    Park, SC
    Kang, H
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 39 (07): : 1739 - 1756
  • [42] Anaerobic co-digestion of winery waste and waste activated sludge: assessment of process feasibility
    Da Ros, C.
    Cavinato, C.
    Cecchi, F.
    Bolzonella, D.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 69 (02) : 269 - 277
  • [43] Multi-hydrolytic enzyme accumulation and microbial community structure of anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste-activated sludge
    Luo, Kun
    Xie, Xiao
    Yang, Qi
    Chen, Fei
    Zhong, Yu
    Xie, Pin
    Wang, Gui
    ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04) : 478 - 487
  • [44] Enhancing methane production in anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste by regulating organic loading rate
    Zhang, Xingxing
    Jiao, Pengbo
    Wang, Yiwei
    Wu, Peng
    Li, Yongmei
    Ma, Liping
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 363
  • [45] Effects of ferric chloride on waste activated sludge and slaughterhouse waste anaerobic co-digestion
    Wu, Yuqi
    Li, Jiangtao
    Ma, Jie
    Xu, Longmei
    Song, Xiulan
    Ding, Jianzhi
    He, Fei
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2025, 239
  • [46] Microbial community changes and metabolic pathways analysis during waste activated sludge and meat processing waste anaerobic co-digestion
    Cao, Fang
    Wu, Yuqi
    Xu, Longmei
    Song, Xiulan
    Ding, Jianzhi
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 363
  • [47] Comparison of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and activated sludge for hydrogen and methane production
    Baldi, F.
    Pecorini, I.
    Lannelli, R.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 143 : 1755 - 1765
  • [48] Anaerobic digestion of activated sludge, anaerobic granular sludge and cow dung with food waste for enhanced methane production
    Gaur, Rubia Zahid
    Suthar, Surindra
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 : 557 - 566
  • [49] Co-digestion of garden waste, food waste, and tofu residue: Effects of mixing ratio on methane production and microbial community structure
    Song, Yingjin
    Meng, Shuyan
    Chen, Guanyi
    Yan, Beibei
    Zhang, Yingxiu
    Tao, Junyu
    Li, Yihang
    Li, Jinlei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (05):
  • [50] Anaerobic waste activated sludge co-digestion with olive mill wastewater
    Athanasoulia, E.
    Melidis, P.
    Aivasidis, A.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 65 (12) : 2251 - 2257