Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge for methane production: Evaluation of optimum ratio, microbial analysis, and kinetic modeling

被引:2
|
作者
Jhunjhunwala, Uday [1 ]
Padhi, Susant Kumar [1 ]
Pattanaik, Lopa [2 ]
Sharma, Dhruv [1 ]
Kumar, Abhishek [1 ]
Chaudhary, Pallavi [1 ]
Saxena, Vikalp [1 ]
机构
[1] Shiv Nadar Inst Eminence Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Greater Noida 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] NIIT Univ, Dept Biotechnol & Bioinformat, Neemrana 301705, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Food waste; Waste activated sludge; Optimum ratio; Methane; Kinetic model; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; ORGANIC WASTES; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; PRETREATMENT; BIOMASS; STRAW; ENHANCEMENT; HYDROLYSIS; STABILITY; COMMUNITY;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-023-04339-x
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste (FW) and waste activated sludge (WAS) in batch reactors (R1-R4) to determine the optimum ratio using the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test. A food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio of similar to 2 was maintained in each reactor, and the result indicated that FW to WAS ratio of 50:50% in R1 was optimum, with the highest cumulative methane production of 5916 mL observed over 32 days. The cumulative methane production follows the order of R1 > R2 > R3 > R4, which is correlated with the reduction of volatile solid (VS) and soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD). The digestate sludge from R1 after methane production shows its potential for use as a biofertilizer based on the acceptable C/N ratio (13.25). In addition, the liquid digestate generated is rich in carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, making this a valuable source of liquid fertilizer. Microbial community analysis using 16S rRNA sequencing in R1 showed the dominance of Firmicutes at the phylum level and Lactobacillus at the genus level in anaerobic co-digestion. The cumulative methane production in various reactors was validated using different kinetic models based on co-efficient of determination (R-2). The Logistic Function model gives a best fit for R1 (R-2 = 0.9915 and methane potential = 5964 mL), whereas the Fitzhugh model gives a good agreement for R2 (R-2 = 0.9885 and methane potential = 3280 mL), R3 (R-2 = 0.9812 and methane potential = 1442 mL), and R4 (R-2 = 0.9721 and methane potential = 1177 mL). The finding of this study would help to scale-up the co-digestion of FW and WAS at an optimum ratio for methane production.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge: ADMI modelling and microbial analysis to gain insights into the two substrates' synergistic effects
    Montecchio, Daniele
    Astals, Sergi
    Di Castro, Vasco
    Gallipoli, Agata
    Gianico, Andrea
    Pagliaccia, Pamela
    Piemonte, Vincenzo
    Rossetti, Simona
    Tonanzi, Barbara
    Braguglia, Camilla M.
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 97 : 27 - 37
  • [32] Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste for Biohydrogen Production
    Jamil, Zadariana
    Yunus, Nurul Azwa Mohd
    MohamadAnnuar, Mohamad Suffian
    Ibrahim, Shaliza
    2013 IEEE BUSINESS ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS COLLOQUIUM (BEIAC 2013), 2013, : 284 - 289
  • [33] Influence of Sludge Retention Time on the Performance and Stability of Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-digestion of Food Waste with Waste Activated Sludge
    Yuan H.-L.
    Ma J.
    Xing B.-S.
    Wen J.-W.
    Han Y.-L.
    Li Q.
    Wang X.-C.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2019, 40 (02): : 994 - 1002
  • [34] Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and Egeria densa: Performance assessment and kinetic analysis
    Zhen, Guangyin
    Lu, Xueqin
    Kobayashi, Takuro
    Li, Yu-You
    Xu, Kaiqin
    Zhao, Youcai
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 148 : 78 - 86
  • [35] Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane
    Yen, Hong-Wei
    Brune, David E.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 98 (01) : 130 - 134
  • [36] Enhanced methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste plus fruit and vegetable waste
    Shangsong Jiang
    Dan Yu
    Fei Xiong
    Xiaoying Lian
    Xiuyan Jiang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 70592 - 70603
  • [37] Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and bio flocculated sewage sludge towards bio-methane production
    Thakur, Hemant
    Verma, Narendra Kumar
    Dhar, Atul
    Powar, Satvasheel
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2024, 11 : 2867 - 2876
  • [38] Enhanced methane production from the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste plus fruit and vegetable waste
    Jiang, Shangsong
    Yu, Dan
    Xiong, Fei
    Lian, Xiaoying
    Jiang, Xiuyan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (27) : 70592 - 70603
  • [39] Process performance of anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and aquaculture sludge
    Wu, Yuqi
    Song, Kang
    AQUACULTURAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 90
  • [40] Effects of mixture ratio and hydraulic retention time on single-stage anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and waste activated sludge
    Heo, Nam Hyo
    Park, Soon Chul
    Kang, Ho
    1739, Marcel Dekker Inc. (39):