Towards biomechanics-based pre-procedural planning for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection

被引:2
|
作者
Kan, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Tao [3 ,4 ]
Jiang, Xiaolang [3 ,4 ]
Holzapfel, Gerhard A. [5 ,6 ]
Dong, Zhihui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Xiao Yun [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Ctr Vasc Surg & Wound Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Inst Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Biomech, Graz, Austria
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Struct Engn, Trondheim, Norway
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Finite element analysis; Tevar; Type B aortic dissection; Stent-graft; Virtual stent-graft deployment; STENT-GRAFT DEPLOYMENT; SIMULATIONS; MECHANICS; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107994
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Although thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) has shown promising outcomes in the treatment of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, complications still occur after TEVAR that can lead to catastrophic events. Biomechanical interactions between the stent-graft (SG) and the local aortic tissue play a critical role in determining the outcome of TEVAR. Different SG design may cause different biomechanical responses in the treated aorta, but such information is not known at the time of pre-procedural planning. By developing patient-specific virtual stent-graft deployment tools, it is possible to analyse and compare the biomechanical impact of different SGs on the local aorta for individual patients. Methods: A finite element based virtual SG deployment model was employed in this study. Computational simulations were performed on a patient-specific model of type B aortic dissection, accounting for details of the SG design and the hyperelastic behaviour of the aortic wall. Based on the geometry reconstructed from the preTEVAR CTA scan, the patient-specific aortic dissection model was created and pre-stressed. Parametric models of three different SG products (SG1, SG2 and SG3) were built with two different lengths for each design. The SG models incorporated different stent and graft materials, stent strut patterns, and assembly approaches. Using our validated SG deployment simulation framework, virtual trials were performed on the patient-specific aortic dissection model using different SG products and varying SG lengths. Conclusion: Simulation results for different SG products suggest that SG3 with a longer length (SG3-long) would be the most appropriate device for the individual patient. Compared to SG1-short (the SG deployed in the patient), SG3-long followed the true lumen tortuosity closely, resulted in a more uniform true lumen expansion and a significant reduction in peak stress in the distal landing zone. These simulation results are promising and demonstrate the feasibility of using the virtual SG deployment model to assist clinicians in pre-procedural planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Versus Aortic Dissection on Outcomes After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Hasan, Irsa S.
    Brown, James A.
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Yousef, Sarah
    Wang, Yisi
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2023, 12 (06):
  • [22] Circadian Variation in Pre-Procedural Rupture of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
    Lu, Chen
    Hu, Jia
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [23] Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B
    Mccullough, Kyle A.
    Hebeler, Katherine R.
    Eisenga, John B.
    Hamman, Baron L.
    Roberts, Charles S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2025, 237 : 79 - 82
  • [24] Retrograde Ascending Aortic Dissection as an Early Complication of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Williams, Judson B.
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    Bhattacharya, Syamal D.
    Andersen, Nicholas D.
    McCann, Richard L.
    Hughes, G. Chad
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 37S - 37S
  • [25] Ascending Geometry After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Descending Aortic Dissection
    Kletzer, Joseph
    Berger, Tim
    Domin, Pauline
    Schlett, Christopher L.
    Kondov, Stoyan
    Fagu, Albi
    Eschenhagen, Matthias
    Czerny, Martin
    Rylski, Bartosz
    Kreibich, Maximilian
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 109 : 485 - 493
  • [26] Acute retrograde aortic dissection during endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm
    Bethuyne, N
    Bove, T
    Van den Brande, P
    Goldstein, JP
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 75 (06): : 1967 - 1969
  • [27] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Dissection Complicated with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation
    Choe, Jeong Cheon
    Lee, Han Cheol
    Lee, Sun Hack
    Ahn, Jinhee
    Park, Jin Sup
    Lee, Hye Won
    Oh, Jun-Hyok
    Choi, Jung Hyun
    Cha, Kwang Soo
    Hong, Taek Jong
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (16) : S229 - S230
  • [28] Retrograde ascending aortic dissection as an early complication of thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Williams, Judson B.
    Andersen, Nicholas D.
    Bhattacharya, Syamal D.
    Scheer, Elizabeth
    Piccini, Jonathan P.
    McCann, Richard L.
    Hughes, G. Chad
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 55 (05) : 1255 - 1262
  • [29] Comprehensive Mechanical Modelling of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Type A Aortic Dissection
    Kan, Xiaoxin
    Yuan, Xun
    Salmasi, M. Yousuf
    Moore, James
    Sasidharan, Sumesh
    Athanasiou, Athanasios
    Xu, Xiao Y.
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    CIRCULATION, 2021, 144
  • [30] Retrograde aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: incidence and associations
    Patterson, B.
    Ludovic, C.
    Peach, G.
    Holt, P.
    Loftus, I.
    Thompson, M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 : 9 - 9