Towards biomechanics-based pre-procedural planning for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of aortic dissection

被引:2
|
作者
Kan, Xiaoxin [1 ,2 ]
Ma, Tao [3 ,4 ]
Jiang, Xiaolang [3 ,4 ]
Holzapfel, Gerhard A. [5 ,6 ]
Dong, Zhihui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Xu, Xiao Yun [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Ctr Vasc Surg & Wound Care, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
[3] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Inst Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Graz Univ Technol, Inst Biomech, Graz, Austria
[6] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Struct Engn, Trondheim, Norway
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Finite element analysis; Tevar; Type B aortic dissection; Stent-graft; Virtual stent-graft deployment; STENT-GRAFT DEPLOYMENT; SIMULATIONS; MECHANICS; ENTRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107994
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Although thoracic aortic endovascular repair (TEVAR) has shown promising outcomes in the treatment of patients with complicated type B aortic dissection, complications still occur after TEVAR that can lead to catastrophic events. Biomechanical interactions between the stent-graft (SG) and the local aortic tissue play a critical role in determining the outcome of TEVAR. Different SG design may cause different biomechanical responses in the treated aorta, but such information is not known at the time of pre-procedural planning. By developing patient-specific virtual stent-graft deployment tools, it is possible to analyse and compare the biomechanical impact of different SGs on the local aorta for individual patients. Methods: A finite element based virtual SG deployment model was employed in this study. Computational simulations were performed on a patient-specific model of type B aortic dissection, accounting for details of the SG design and the hyperelastic behaviour of the aortic wall. Based on the geometry reconstructed from the preTEVAR CTA scan, the patient-specific aortic dissection model was created and pre-stressed. Parametric models of three different SG products (SG1, SG2 and SG3) were built with two different lengths for each design. The SG models incorporated different stent and graft materials, stent strut patterns, and assembly approaches. Using our validated SG deployment simulation framework, virtual trials were performed on the patient-specific aortic dissection model using different SG products and varying SG lengths. Conclusion: Simulation results for different SG products suggest that SG3 with a longer length (SG3-long) would be the most appropriate device for the individual patient. Compared to SG1-short (the SG deployed in the patient), SG3-long followed the true lumen tortuosity closely, resulted in a more uniform true lumen expansion and a significant reduction in peak stress in the distal landing zone. These simulation results are promising and demonstrate the feasibility of using the virtual SG deployment model to assist clinicians in pre-procedural planning.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Acute Aortic Dissection
    Uchida, Tetsuro
    Sadahiro, Mitsuaki
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR DISEASES, 2018, 11 (04) : 464 - 472
  • [2] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for ascending aortic aneurysm or dissection
    Serna-Gallegos, Derek
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Navid, Forozan
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 11 (01) : 59 - 61
  • [3] Retrograde Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Ozdemir, Baris A.
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Holt, Peter J. E.
    Loftus, Ian M.
    Thompson, Matt M.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2014, 260 (02) : 389 - 395
  • [4] Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Chino, Shuji
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Shimpo, Hideto
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Mizumoto, Toru
    Sato, Tomoaki
    Okabe, Manabu
    Sakuma, Hajime
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 102 (05): : 1536 - 1542
  • [5] Thoracic endovascular aortic repair for retrograde type A aortic dissection
    Higashigawa, Takatoshi
    Kato, Noriyuki
    Nakajima, Ken
    Chino, Shuji
    Hashimoto, Takashi
    Ouchi, Takafumi
    Tokui, Toshiya
    Maze, Yasumi
    Mizumoto, Toru
    Teranishi, Satoshi
    Yamamto, Naoki
    Ito, Hisato
    Sakuma, Hajime
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (06) : 1685 - 1693
  • [6] Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection
    Younes, Houssam K.
    Harris, Patricia W.
    Bismuth, Jean
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer
    Peden, Eric K.
    Lumsden, Alan B.
    Davies, Mark G.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [7] Retrograde Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Canaud, L.
    Ozdemir, B. A.
    Patterson, B. O.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (06) : 1710 - 1710
  • [8] Finite element modeling to predict procedural success of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in type A aortic dissection
    Yuan, Xun
    Kan, Xiaoxin
    Xu, Xiao Yun
    Nienaber, Christoph A.
    JTCVS TECHNIQUES, 2020, 4 : 40 - 47
  • [9] Retrograde Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
    Canaud, Ludovic
    Ozdemir, Baris A.
    Holt, Peter
    Thompson, Matt
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 59 (06) : 4S - 5S
  • [10] Extended thoracic endovascular aortic repair for residual aortic dissection after type A aortic dissection repair
    Iida, Yasunori
    Hachiya, Takashi
    Asano, Ryota
    Inoue, Shinya
    Fujii, Susumu
    Sawa, Shigeharu
    Shimizu, Hideyuki
    VASCULAR, 2021, 29 (06) : 826 - 831