AAC & Literacy: A Scoping Review of Print Knowledge Measures for Students who use Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication

被引:0
|
作者
Collins, Sara C. [1 ]
Barton-Hulsey, Andrea [2 ]
Timm-Fulkerson, Christy [2 ]
Therrien, Michelle C. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Maryland, Dept Speech Language Hearing Sci, 4501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 201 W Bloxham St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Print knowledge; Orthography; Reading; Scoping review; Assessment; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; WORD RECOGNITION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; SEVERE SPEECH; SIGHT WORD; SYSTEMATIC INSTRUCTION; PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; DYNAMIC TEXT; EYE TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-023-09934-4
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Understanding the early literacy abilities of children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is essential for designing and testing methods of reading intervention focused on printed orthography. School-based professionals need assessments that measure word reading skills of students with heterogenous speech and physical abilities. This scoping review describes the assessment and administration procedures in research studies that have been used to measure the print knowledge of students who use aided AAC. This review included 27 studies that described print knowledge assessments targeting awareness of print concepts, letter identification, letter-sound correspondence, print-based phonological awareness, decoding, or sight word recognition that was administered to at least one student who uses aided AAC. Participant characteristics, measures of print knowledge, as well as contexts and features of assessment format and administration were coded. Our review identified 27 studies in which 155 students who used aided AAC participated in assessments of print knowledge. Most assessments measured students' decoding and sight word recognition skills with little attention toward awareness of print concepts and print-based phonological awareness. A range of procedures were identified across studies. More than 40% of assessments included a format or response method to participate that was not comparable to participants' typical communication method. Research should continue to develop and test assessments that are accessible for students with physical and communication support needs that require AAC. In doing so, these tools may be used with all students, regardless of speech ability, to understand early literacy skills that inform individualized reading instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 645
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) and inclusive education for students with the most severe disabilities
    Calculator, Stephen N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INCLUSIVE EDUCATION, 2009, 13 (01) : 93 - 113
  • [32] Attitudes toward individuals who use augmentative and alternative communication: Research review
    McCarthy, J
    Light, J
    AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2005, 21 (01) : 41 - 55
  • [33] Friendships with children who use augmentative and alternative communication
    Anderson, Kate
    Balandin, Susan
    Clendon, Sally
    Hemsley, Bronwyn
    JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2009, 6 (02) : 92 - 92
  • [34] Foundational Reading Interventions Adapted for Individuals Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): a Systematic Review of the Research
    April M. Yorke
    Jessica Gosnell Caron
    Nina Pukys
    Emily Sternad
    Christina Grecol
    Carley Shermak
    Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 2021, 33 : 537 - 582
  • [35] Foundational Reading Interventions Adapted for Individuals Who Require Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC): a Systematic Review of the Research
    Yorke, April M.
    Caron, Jessica Gosnell
    Pukys, Nina
    Sternad, Emily
    Grecol, Christina
    Shermak, Carley
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND PHYSICAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 33 (04) : 537 - 582
  • [36] Assisting children and families who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices: Best practices for school psychologists
    Parette, HP
    Marr, DD
    PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, 1997, 34 (04) : 337 - 346
  • [37] Communicative Competence Inventory for Students Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication A Team Approach
    Chung, Yun-Ching
    Douglas, Karen H.
    TEACHING EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN, 2014, 47 (01) : 56 - 68
  • [38] Social Interactions of Students with Disabilities Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication in Inclusive Classrooms
    Chung, Yun-Ching
    Carter, Erik W.
    Sisco, Lynn G.
    AJIDD-AMERICAN JOURNAL ON INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 117 (05): : 349 - 367
  • [39] Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Advances: A Review of Configurations for Individuals with a Speech Disability
    Elsahar, Yasmin
    Hu, Sijung
    Bouazza-Marouf, Kaddour
    Kerr, David
    Mansor, Annysa
    SENSORS, 2019, 19 (08)
  • [40] Professional Networks and Self-Efficacy of Paraeducators Working with Students with Learning to Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC)
    Biggs, Elizabeth E.
    Bumble, Jennifer L.
    Hacker, Rebecca E.
    Scotti, Kendra E.
    Cushing, Caitlin E.
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2024,