AAC & Literacy: A Scoping Review of Print Knowledge Measures for Students who use Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication

被引:0
|
作者
Collins, Sara C. [1 ]
Barton-Hulsey, Andrea [2 ]
Timm-Fulkerson, Christy [2 ]
Therrien, Michelle C. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Maryland, Dept Speech Language Hearing Sci, 4501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 201 W Bloxham St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Print knowledge; Orthography; Reading; Scoping review; Assessment; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; WORD RECOGNITION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; SEVERE SPEECH; SIGHT WORD; SYSTEMATIC INSTRUCTION; PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; DYNAMIC TEXT; EYE TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-023-09934-4
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Understanding the early literacy abilities of children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is essential for designing and testing methods of reading intervention focused on printed orthography. School-based professionals need assessments that measure word reading skills of students with heterogenous speech and physical abilities. This scoping review describes the assessment and administration procedures in research studies that have been used to measure the print knowledge of students who use aided AAC. This review included 27 studies that described print knowledge assessments targeting awareness of print concepts, letter identification, letter-sound correspondence, print-based phonological awareness, decoding, or sight word recognition that was administered to at least one student who uses aided AAC. Participant characteristics, measures of print knowledge, as well as contexts and features of assessment format and administration were coded. Our review identified 27 studies in which 155 students who used aided AAC participated in assessments of print knowledge. Most assessments measured students' decoding and sight word recognition skills with little attention toward awareness of print concepts and print-based phonological awareness. A range of procedures were identified across studies. More than 40% of assessments included a format or response method to participate that was not comparable to participants' typical communication method. Research should continue to develop and test assessments that are accessible for students with physical and communication support needs that require AAC. In doing so, these tools may be used with all students, regardless of speech ability, to understand early literacy skills that inform individualized reading instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 645
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Roles of Animation in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: a Scoping Review
    Ralf W. Schlosser
    Nicole Choe
    Rajinder Koul
    Howard C. Shane
    Christina Yu
    Mengxuan Wu
    Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 2022, 9 : 187 - 203
  • [22] A grounded theory of Internet and social media use by young people who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
    Hynan, Amanda
    Goldbart, Juliet
    Murray, Janice
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (16-17) : 1559 - 1575
  • [23] Roles of Animation in Augmentative and Alternative Communication: a Scoping Review
    Schlosser, Ralf W.
    Choe, Nicole
    Koul, Rajinder
    Shane, Howard C.
    Yu, Christina
    Wu, Mengxuan
    CURRENT DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS REPORTS, 2022, 9 (04) : 187 - 203
  • [24] Intervention and Sampling Trends in Literacy Research for Young Augmentative and Alternative Communication Users: A Scoping Review
    Benson-Goldberg, Sofia
    Erickson, Karen
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2025, 68 (02): : 685 - 704
  • [25] Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interventions that promote commenting: a systematic review
    Spencer, Trina D.
    Tonsing, Kerstin
    Dada, Shakila
    AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2025,
  • [26] Enhancing vocabulary selection for preschoolers who require augmentative and alternative communication (AAC)
    Fallon, KA
    Light, JC
    Paige, TK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2001, 10 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [27] A scoping review of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventions in Low-and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs)
    Muttiah, Nimisha
    Gormley, Jessica
    Drager, Kathryn D. R.
    AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2022, 38 (02) : 123 - 134
  • [28] WHAT LITERACY INSTRUCTION IS PROVIDED TO STUDENTS WITH INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY WHO REQUIRE ALTERNATIVE AND AUGMENTATIVE COMMUNICATION ?
    Dessemontet, R. S.
    Meuli, N.
    Linder, A. -L.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2024, 68 (07) : 807 - 807
  • [29] SAUDI SPECIAL EDUCATION STUDENT TEACHERS' KNOWLEDGE OF AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION (AAC)
    Subihi, Ahmad Saeed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2013, 28 (03) : 93 - 103
  • [30] Learning to use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): Is there a mentoring role for adults experienced in using AAC?
    Ballin, Liora
    Balandin, Susan
    Togher, Leanne
    Stancliffe, Roger J.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2009, 34 (01): : 89 - 91