AAC & Literacy: A Scoping Review of Print Knowledge Measures for Students who use Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication

被引:0
|
作者
Collins, Sara C. [1 ]
Barton-Hulsey, Andrea [2 ]
Timm-Fulkerson, Christy [2 ]
Therrien, Michelle C. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ Maryland, Dept Speech Language Hearing Sci, 4501 N Charles St, Baltimore, MD 21210 USA
[2] Florida State Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, 201 W Bloxham St, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
关键词
Augmentative and alternative communication; Print knowledge; Orthography; Reading; Scoping review; Assessment; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; WORD RECOGNITION; YOUNG-CHILDREN; SEVERE SPEECH; SIGHT WORD; SYSTEMATIC INSTRUCTION; PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS; PHONEMIC AWARENESS; DYNAMIC TEXT; EYE TRACKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10882-023-09934-4
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Understanding the early literacy abilities of children who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) is essential for designing and testing methods of reading intervention focused on printed orthography. School-based professionals need assessments that measure word reading skills of students with heterogenous speech and physical abilities. This scoping review describes the assessment and administration procedures in research studies that have been used to measure the print knowledge of students who use aided AAC. This review included 27 studies that described print knowledge assessments targeting awareness of print concepts, letter identification, letter-sound correspondence, print-based phonological awareness, decoding, or sight word recognition that was administered to at least one student who uses aided AAC. Participant characteristics, measures of print knowledge, as well as contexts and features of assessment format and administration were coded. Our review identified 27 studies in which 155 students who used aided AAC participated in assessments of print knowledge. Most assessments measured students' decoding and sight word recognition skills with little attention toward awareness of print concepts and print-based phonological awareness. A range of procedures were identified across studies. More than 40% of assessments included a format or response method to participate that was not comparable to participants' typical communication method. Research should continue to develop and test assessments that are accessible for students with physical and communication support needs that require AAC. In doing so, these tools may be used with all students, regardless of speech ability, to understand early literacy skills that inform individualized reading instruction.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 645
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Models and frameworks for guiding assessment for aided Augmentative and Alternative communication (AAC): a scoping review
    Burnham, Seamus P. L.
    Finak, Paulina
    Henderson, Jillian T.
    Gaurav, Navjit
    Batorowicz, Beata
    Pinder, Shane D.
    Davies, T. Claire
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (04) : 1758 - 1772
  • [2] Aided Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) interventions in India: A scoping review and quality appraisal
    Philip, Vineetha Sara
    Geetha, Swathi
    Abraham, Anitha Naittee
    AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2025,
  • [3] A scoping review of communication outcomes measures in augmentative and alternative communication
    Bean, Allison
    Harris, Kyle
    Kim, Hanna
    Digiovine, Carmen
    Sonntag, Amy Miller
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 37 : S65 - S86
  • [4] OT's Role in Literacy Learning for Children Who Use an Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) Device
    Trujillo, Christopher
    Del Monte, Brenda
    Conatser, Melanie
    Norris, Gina
    Westcott, Carrie
    Malmgren, Tauni
    Moritz, Kelly
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 74 (04):
  • [5] Improving Literacy Skills in Students with Complex Communication Needs Who Use Augmentative/Alternative Communication Systems
    Bailey, Rita L.
    Angell, Maureen E.
    Stoner, Julia B.
    EDUCATION AND TRAINING IN AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2011, 46 (03) : 352 - 368
  • [6] Exploring the Perspectives of People Who Use Alternative and Augmentative Communication Aids (AAC)
    Broomfield, Katherine
    Sage, Karen
    HARNESSING THE POWER OF TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE LIVES, 2017, 242 : 370 - 373
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to accommodations in the workplace for adults who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review
    Lackey, Stephanie
    Hyatt, Glenda Watson
    Batorowicz, Beata
    van Engelen, Sydney
    Li, Shuangxi
    Pinder, Shane
    Davies, T. Claire
    AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION, 2023, 39 (03) : 181 - 197
  • [8] Teachers' Perspectives on Literacy Instruction for Students With Severe Disabilities Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication
    Ruppar, Andrea L.
    Dymond, Stacy K.
    Gaffney, Janet S.
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE FOR PERSONS WITH SEVERE DISABILITIES, 2011, 36 (3-4): : 100 - 111
  • [9] Aided augmentative and alternative communication intervention for adults with developmental disabilities: a scoping review
    Boster, Jamie B.
    Sonntag, Amy Miller
    Evans, Anna
    Luo, Ann
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2024,
  • [10] LITERACY AND AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION (AAC) - THE EXPECTATIONS AND PRIORITIES OF PARENTS AND TEACHERS
    LIGHT, J
    MCNAUGHTON, D
    TOPICS IN LANGUAGE DISORDERS, 1993, 13 (02) : 33 - 46