Global Sensitivity Analysis in Aerodynamic Design Using Shapley Effects and Polynomial Chaos Regression

被引:0
|
作者
Palar, Pramudita Satria [1 ]
Zuhal, Lavi Rizki [1 ]
Shimoyama, Koji [2 ]
机构
[1] Bandung Inst Technol, Fac Mech & Aerosp Engn, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
关键词
Aerodynamics; Input variables; Computational modeling; Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Probability density function; Estimation; Chaos; Global sensitivity analysis; Shapley effects; polynomial chaos expansion; aerodynamics; EXPANSION; INDEXES; UNCERTAINTY; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3324918
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantifying the impact of design variables in aerodynamic design exploration can provide valuable insights to designers. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is a crucial tool in aerodynamic design exploration that enables designers to gain valuable insights by quantifying the impact of design variables. In the field of GSA, the Shapley effect is a powerful alternative to total Sobol indices due to several mathematical advantages of the former. However, computing the Shapley effect is computationally expensive due to the large number of permutations involved. To overcome this challenge, surrogate models are often used to accurately estimate Shapley effects while reducing the number of function calls. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of using PCE to compute Shapley effects for independent inputs in aerodynamic design exploration. The exact calculation from PCE also enables the rapid assessment of confidence intervals for Shapley effects, taking into account the randomness in the experimental design via bootstrap resampling. The usefulness of Shapley effects with PCE is then demonstrated and compared with total Sobol indices through a nonlinear test function and three engineering problems, including subsonic wing, transonic airfoil, and fan blade design. The results also show that the confidence intervals of the Shapley effects are narrower than those of total Sobol indices, allowing better interpretation and higher confidence on the estimated GSA metric.
引用
收藏
页码:114825 / 114839
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global sensitivity analysis via multi-fidelity polynomial chaos expansion
    Palar, Pramudita Satria
    Zuhal, Lavi Rizki
    Shimoyama, Koji
    Tsuchiya, Takeshi
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 170 : 175 - 190
  • [42] Using polynomial chaos expansion for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of bridge structures
    Ni, Pinghe
    Xia, Yong
    Li, Jun
    Hao, Hong
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2019, 119 : 293 - 311
  • [43] Global sensitivity analysis in the context of imprecise probabilities (p-boxes) using sparse polynomial chaos expansions
    Schobi, Roland
    Sudret, Bruno
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 187 : 129 - 141
  • [44] Time-Dependent Global Sensitivity Analysis for Long-Term Degeneracy Model Using Polynomial Chaos
    Guo, Jianbin
    Du, Shaohua
    Wang, Yao
    Zeng, Shengkui
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014,
  • [45] Distribution-based global sensitivity analysis in case of correlated input parameters using polynomial chaos expansions
    Caniou, Y.
    Sudret, B.
    APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 695 - 702
  • [46] ROBUST OPTIMIZATION FOR AERODYNAMIC PROBLEMS USING POLYNOMIAL CHAOS AND ADJOINTS
    Shankaran, Sriram
    Marta, Andre
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO 2012, VOL 8, PTS A-C, 2012, : 2217 - 2227
  • [47] Computing derivative-based global sensitivity measures using polynomial chaos expansions
    Sudret, B.
    Mai, C. V.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 134 : 241 - 250
  • [48] Global sensitivity analysis with multifidelity Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos expansion for vascular haemodynamics
    Schafer, Friederike
    Schiavazzi, Daniele E.
    Hellevik, Leif Rune
    Sturdy, Jacob
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 40 (08)
  • [49] Computing Shapley Effects for Sensitivity Analysis
    Plischke, Elmar
    Rabitti, Giovanni
    Borgonovo, Emanuele
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2021, 9 (04): : 1411 - 1437
  • [50] Global sensitivity analysis with aggregated Shapley effects, application to avalanche hazard assessment
    Heredia, Maria Belen
    Prieur, Clementine
    Eckert, Nicolas
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 222