Global Sensitivity Analysis in Aerodynamic Design Using Shapley Effects and Polynomial Chaos Regression

被引:0
|
作者
Palar, Pramudita Satria [1 ]
Zuhal, Lavi Rizki [1 ]
Shimoyama, Koji [2 ]
机构
[1] Bandung Inst Technol, Fac Mech & Aerosp Engn, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Kyushu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fukuoka 8190395, Japan
关键词
Aerodynamics; Input variables; Computational modeling; Uncertainty; Sensitivity analysis; Probability density function; Estimation; Chaos; Global sensitivity analysis; Shapley effects; polynomial chaos expansion; aerodynamics; EXPANSION; INDEXES; UNCERTAINTY; BOOTSTRAP;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3324918
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Quantifying the impact of design variables in aerodynamic design exploration can provide valuable insights to designers. Global sensitivity analysis (GSA) is a crucial tool in aerodynamic design exploration that enables designers to gain valuable insights by quantifying the impact of design variables. In the field of GSA, the Shapley effect is a powerful alternative to total Sobol indices due to several mathematical advantages of the former. However, computing the Shapley effect is computationally expensive due to the large number of permutations involved. To overcome this challenge, surrogate models are often used to accurately estimate Shapley effects while reducing the number of function calls. This paper aims to investigate the effectiveness of using PCE to compute Shapley effects for independent inputs in aerodynamic design exploration. The exact calculation from PCE also enables the rapid assessment of confidence intervals for Shapley effects, taking into account the randomness in the experimental design via bootstrap resampling. The usefulness of Shapley effects with PCE is then demonstrated and compared with total Sobol indices through a nonlinear test function and three engineering problems, including subsonic wing, transonic airfoil, and fan blade design. The results also show that the confidence intervals of the Shapley effects are narrower than those of total Sobol indices, allowing better interpretation and higher confidence on the estimated GSA metric.
引用
收藏
页码:114825 / 114839
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sensitivity Analysis of Via Impedance using Polynomial Chaos Expansion
    Preibisch, Jan B.
    Triverio, Piero
    Schuster, Christian
    2015 IEEE 19TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL AND POWER INTEGRITY (SPI), 2015,
  • [32] Sensitivity analysis of cardiac electrophysiological models using polynomial chaos
    Geneser, Sarah E.
    Kirby, Robert M.
    Sachse, Frank B.
    2005 27TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY, VOLS 1-7, 2005, : 4042 - 4045
  • [33] Efficient design of experiments for sensitivity analysis based on polynomial chaos expansions
    Burnaev, Evgeny
    Panin, Ivan
    Sudret, Bruno
    ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, 81 (1-2) : 187 - 207
  • [34] Efficient design of experiments for sensitivity analysis based on polynomial chaos expansions
    Evgeny Burnaev
    Ivan Panin
    Bruno Sudret
    Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 2017, 81 : 187 - 207
  • [35] Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions
    Blatman, Geraud
    Sudret, Bruno
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (11) : 1216 - 1229
  • [36] Global Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Radiated Susceptibility in PCB Using Nonintrusive Polynomial Chaos Expansions
    Bdour, Tarek
    Reineix, Alain
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2016, 58 (03) : 939 - 942
  • [37] Predicting remediation efficiency of LNAPLs using surrogate polynomial chaos expansion model and global sensitivity analysis
    Kim, Taehoon
    Han, Weon Shik
    Piao, Jize
    Kang, Peter K.
    Shin, Jehyun
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2022, 163
  • [38] Global Sensitivity Analysis for Islanded Microgrid Based on Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion
    Wang H.
    Yan Z.
    Xu X.
    He K.
    Dianli Xitong Zidonghua/Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2019, 43 (10): : 44 - 52
  • [39] Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of complex chemical process using a generalized polynomial chaos approach
    Pham Luu Trung Duong
    Ali, Wahid
    Kwok, Ezra
    Lee, Moonyong
    COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 90 : 23 - 30
  • [40] Active Learning of Ensemble Polynomial Chaos Expansion Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis
    Shang, Xiaobing
    Wang, Lipeng
    Fang, Hai
    Lu, Lingyun
    Zhang, Zhi
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 249